Changes from Heidelberg Catechism (1563)

Diff style

Question 1, from Question 1

What is thy only comfort in Life and Death?

That I with body and soul, both in life Soul and death, Body, whether I live or dye, I am not my mine own, but belong wholly unto my most faithful Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ: who with by his most precious Blood hath fully satisfied satisfying for all my Sins, and hath delivered me from all the power of the Devil, and so preserveth me, that without the will of my Heavenly Father not a so much as an Hair can may fall from my Head; yea that all things must be subservient to serve for my salvation, and therefore, safety: wherefore by his holy Spirit he also he assureth me of eternal everlasting Life, and maketh me sincerely willing and ready and prepared, that henceforth to unto I may live to him.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 1

What is thy only comfort in life and death?

That I with body and soul, both in life and death, am not my own, but belong unto my faithful Saviour Jesus Christ, who, with his precious blood, hath fully satisfied for all my sins, and delivered me from all the power of the devil; and so preserves me that without the will of my heavenly Father, not a hair can fall from my head; yea, that all things must be subservient to my salvation, and therefore, by his holy spirit, he also assures me of eternal life, and makes me sincerely willing and ready henceforth, to live unto him.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 1

What is thy only comfort in Life and Death?

That both in Soul and Body, whether I live or dye, I am not mine own, but belong wholly unto my most faithful Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ: who by his most precious Blood fully satisfying for all my Sins, hath delivered me from all the power of the Devil, and so preserveth me, that without the will of my Heavenly Father not so much as an Hair may fall from my Head; yea all things must serve for my safety: wherefore by his Spirit also he assureth me of everlasting Life, and maketh me ready and prepared, that henceforth I may live to him.

Question 2, from Question 2

How many things are necessary for thee to know, that thou enjoying injoying this comfort mayest mayst live and die dye happily?

Three. The first, how great what is the greatness of my sins sin and miseries are: misery. The second, how I may be am delivered from all my sins Sin and miseries: Misery. The third, how what thanks I shall express my gratitude to owe unto God for such deliverance.this delivery.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 2

How many things are necessary for thee to know that thou, enjoying this comfort, mayest live and die happily?

Three; the first, how great my sins and miseries are: the second, how I may be delivered from all my sins and miseries: the third, how I shall express my gratitude to God for such deliverance.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 2

How many things are necessary for thee to know, that thou injoying this comfort mayst live and dye happily?

Three. The first, what is the greatness of my sin and misery. The second, how I am delivered from all Sin and Misery. The third, what thanks I owe unto God for this delivery.

Question 3, from Question 3

No change, but in spelling and punctuation.

Whence knowest thou thy misery?

Out of the Law of God.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 3

Whence knowest thou thy misery?

Out of the law of God.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 3

Whence knowest thou thy misery?

Out of the Law of God.

Question 4, from Question 4

What doth the Law of God require of us?

Christ teaches us briefly, Mat. xxii. 37—40. That which Christ doth summarily teach us, Matthew 22:37–40. Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy Heart, and with all thy Soul, and with all thy Mind, and with all thy Strength. This is the first and the great command; Commandment; and the second is like to this, unto it, Thou shalt love thy Neighbour as thyself. thy self. On these two Commandments hang the whole Law and the Prophets.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 4

What doth the law of God require of us?

Christ teaches us that briefly, Mat. xxii. 37—40. “Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, with all thy soul, with all thy mind, and with all thy strength. This is the first and the great command; and the second is like to this, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. On these two commands hang the whole law and the prophets.”

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 4

What doth the Law of God require of us?

That which Christ doth summarily teach us, Matthew 22:37–40. Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy Heart, and with all thy Soul, and with all thy Mind, and with all thy Strength. This is the first and the great Commandment; and the second is like unto it, Thou shalt love thy Neighbour as thy self. On these two Commandments hang the whole Law and the Prophets.

Question 5, from Question 5

Canst Art thou able to keep all these things perfectly?

In No wise; truly: for by nature I am prone by nature to hate the hatred of God, and of my Neighbours.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 5

Canst thou keep all these things perfectly?

In no wise; for I am prone by nature to hate God and my neighbour.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 5

Art thou able to keep all these things perfectly?

No truly: for by nature I am prone to the hatred of God, and of my Neighbours.

Question 6, from Question 6

Did God then create make man so wicked and perverse?

By no means; Not so, but God created man rather he made him good, and after to his own Image; in that is, indued with true Righteousness and true Holiness, that he might rightly know God his Creator, and heartily love him, and live with him in eternal happiness to glorify blessed for ever, and that to laud and praise magnify him.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 6

Did God then create man so wicked and perverse?

By no means; but God created man good, and after his own image, in righteousness, and true holiness, that he might rightly know God his Creator, heartily love him, and live with him in eternal happiness to glorify and praise him.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 6

Did God then make man so wicked and perverse?

Not so, but rather he made him good, and to his own Image; that is, indued with true Righteousness and Holiness, that he might rightly know God his Creator, and heartily love him, and live with him blessed for ever, and that to laud and magnify him.

Question 7, from Question 7

Whence then proceeds this depravity ariseth the wickedness of human Mans nature?

From the fall and disobedience of our first Parents Adam and Eve: in Paradise; hence is our nature is become so corrupt that we are all conceived and born in Sin.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 7

Whence then proceeds this depravity of human nature?

From the fall and disobedience of our first parents, Adam and Eve, in Paradise; hence our nature is become so corrupt, that we are all conceived and born in sin.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 7

Whence then ariseth the wickedness of Mans nature?

From the fall and disobedience of our first Parents Adam and Eve: hence is our nature so corrupt that we are all conceived and born in Sin.

Question 8, from Question 8

Are we then so corrupt that we are wholly incapable of doing any good, not at all apt to do well, and inclined are prone to all wickedness?vice?

Indeed we are, except we are regenerated by the spirit of God.Holy Ghost.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 8

Are we then so corrupt that we are wholly incapable of doing any good, and inclined to all wickedness?

Indeed we are; except we are regenerated by the spirit of God.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 8

Are we so corrupt that we are not at all apt to do well, and are prone to all vice?

Indeed we are, except we are regenerated by the Holy Ghost.

Question 9, from Question 9

Doth not God then do injustice Injury to Man by requiring from him who in his the Law requireth that of him which he cannot is not able to perform?

Not at all; No; For God had made Man capable of performing such a one as he might perform it: but Man by the instigation impulsion of the Devil, and his own wilful disobedience, deprived stubbornness bereaved himself and all his posterity of those Divine gifts.Graces.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 9

Doth not God then do injustice to man, by requiring from him in his law, that which he cannot perform?

Not at all; for God made man capable of performing it, but man, by the instigation of the devil, and his own wilful disobedience, deprived himself and all his posterity of those divine gifts.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 9

Doth not God then Injury to Man who in the Law requireth that of him which he is not able to perform?

No; For God had made Man such a one as he might perform it: but Man by the impulsion of the Devil, and his own stubbornness bereaved himself and all his posterity of those Divine Graces.

Question 10, from Question 10

Will Doth God suffer such disobedience leave this stubbornness and rebellion to go falling away of Man unpunished?

By No: means: but is terribly displeased with our original angry in most dreadful manner, as well as actual for the sins wherein we are born, as also for those which our selves commit, and will punish them in his most just Judgment temporally punisheth them with present and eternally, everlasting Punishments, as he hath declared, is every one himself pronounceth: Cursed be he that continueth confirmeth not in all things, which are written in the book words of the this Law to do them.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 10

Will God suffer such disobedience and rebellion to go unpunished?

By no means: but is terribly displeased with our original as well as actual sins; and will punish them in his just judgment, temporally and eternally, as he hath declared, “Cursed is every one that continueth not in all things, which are written in the book of the law, to do them.”

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 10

Doth God leave this stubbornness and falling away of Man unpunished?

No: but is angry in most dreadful manner, as well for the sins wherein we are born, as also for those which our selves commit, and in most just Judgment punisheth them with present and everlasting Punishments, as himself pronounceth: Cursed be he that confirmeth not all the words of this Law to do them.

Question 11, from Question 11

Is not God then also therefore merciful?

God Yea, Verily he is indeed merciful; but so, that he is also just: therefore wherefore his Justice requireth that sin, the same which is committed against the most high divine Majesty of God, be punished should also be recompenced with extream, that is, with everlasting Punishment both of in Body and Soul.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 11

Is not God then also merciful?

God is indeed merciful, but also just; therefore his justice requires, that sin, which is committed against the most high majesty of God, be also punished with extreme, that is, with everlasting punishment, both of body and soul.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 11

Is not God therefore merciful?

Yea, Verily he is merciful; but so, that he is also just: wherefore his Justice requireth that the same which is committed against the divine Majesty of God, should also be recompenced with extream, that is, everlasting Punishment both in Body and Soul.

Question 12, from Question 12

Since Seeing then by the righteous just Judgment of God we deserve are subject both to temporal and eternal punishment; Punishments, is there no yet any way by which or means remaining whereby we may escape that punishment, be delivered from these Punishments, and be again received into favour?reconciled to God?

God will have his Justice satisfied: and therefore wherefore it is necessary that we must make this full satisfaction, satisfy either by ourselves, our selves, or by another.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 12

Since then, by the righteous judgment of God, we deserve temporal and eternal punishment; is there no way by which we may escape that punishment, and be again received into favour?

God will have his justice satisfied: and therefore we must make this full satisfaction, either by ourselves, or by another.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 12

Seeing then by the just Judgment of God we are subject both to temporal and eternal Punishments, is there yet any way or means remaining whereby we may be delivered from these Punishments, and be reconciled to God?

God will have his Justice satisfied: wherefore it is necessary that we satisfy either by our selves, or by another.

Question 13, from Question 13

Can Are we ourselves then make this satisfaction?able to satisfy by our selves?

By no means; but on the contrary Not a whit. Nay rather we daily do every day increase our debt.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 13

Can we ourselves then make this satisfaction?

By no means; but on the contrary we daily increase our debt.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 13

Are we able to satisfy by our selves?

Not a whit. Nay rather we do every day increase our debt.

Question 14, from Question 14

Can Is there be found anywhere, one who any creature in Heaven or in Earth, which is only a mere creature, able to satisfy for us?

None. For first God will not punish that Sin in any other creature for the sin which man hath committed: and further, no mere creature neither can that which is nothing but a creature sustain the burden of God’s eternal wrath of God against sin, so as to and deliver others from it.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 14

Can there be found anywhere, one who is a mere creature, able to satisfy for us?

None; for first, God will not punish any other creature for the sin which man hath committed; and further, no mere creature can sustain the burden of God’s eternal wrath against sin, so as to deliver others from it.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 14

Is there any creature in Heaven or in Earth, which is only a creature, able to satisfy for us?

None. For first God will not punish that Sin in any other creature which man hath committed: and further, neither can that which is nothing but a creature sustain the wrath of God against sin, and deliver others from it.

Question 15, from Question 15

What sort manner of a mediator Mediatour then, and Deliverer then must we seek for?

For Such a one who verily as is very Man, and perfectly righteous; just, and yet more powerful than in Power above all creatures, that is, one who is also also is very God.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 15

What sort of a mediator and deliverer then must we seek for?

For one who is very man, and perfectly righteous; and yet more powerful than all creatures; that is, one who is also very God.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 15

What manner of Mediatour then, and Deliverer must we seek for?

Such a one verily as is very Man, and perfectly just, and yet in Power above all creatures, that is, one who also is very God.

Question 16, from Question 16

Why must Wherefore is it necessary that he be very Man, and also that perfectly righteous?just too?

Because that the Justice of God requireth that the same humane nature which hath sinned, should do it self likewise make satisfaction recompence for sin: and one, who but he that is himself a sinner, cannot satisfy make recompence for others.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 16

Why must he be very man, and also perfectly righteous?

Because the justice of God requires that the same human nature, which hath sinned, should likewise make satisfaction for sin; and one, who is himself a sinner, cannot satisfy for others.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 16

Wherefore is it necessary that he be very Man, and that perfectly just too?

Because that the Justice of God requireth that the same humane nature which hath sinned, do it self likewise make recompence for sin: but he that is himself a sinner, cannot make recompence for others.

Question 17, from Question 17

Why must he in one person also be also very God?

That he might by the Power of his Godhead sustain in his human nature, flesh the burthen of God’s wrath, and might obtain for, recover and restore to unto us that Righteousness and Life which we lost.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 17

Why must he in one person be also very God?

That he might, by the power of his Godhead, sustain in his human nature, the burthen of God’s wrath; and might obtain for, and restore to us, righteousness and life.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 17

Why must he also be very God?

That he might by the Power of his Godhead sustain in his flesh the burthen of God’s wrath, and might recover and restore unto us that Righteousness and Life which we lost.

Question 18, from Question 18

And who then is that mediator, who Mediatour which is in one person together both very God, and a real righteous very perfectly just Man?

Even our Lord Jesus Christ, who of God is made unto to us of God’s Wisdom, and Righteousness, and Sanctification and & Redemption.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 18

Who then is that mediator, who is in one person both very God, and a real righteous man?

Our Lord Jesus Christ: “who of God is made unto us wisdom, and righteousness, and sanctification, and redemption.”

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 18

And who is that Mediatour which is together both very God, and a very perfectly just Man?

Even our Lord Jesus Christ, who is made to us of God’s Wisdom, Righteousness, Sanctification & Redemption.

Question 19, from Question 19

Whence knowest thou this?

From Out of the holy Gospel which God himself revealed first made known in Paradise, and afterwards published did spread it a broad by the Patriarchs and Prophets: and was pleased to represent shadowed it by the shadows of Sacrifices and the other Ceremonies of the Law; and lastly has accomplished it by his only begotten Son Christ our Lord.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 19

Whence knowest thou this?

From the holy gospel, which God himself revealed first in Paradise; and afterwards published by the Patriarchs and Prophets, and was pleased to represent it, by the shadows of sacrifices and the other ceremonies of the law; and lastly, has accomplished it by his only begotten Son.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 19

Whence knowest thou this?

Out of the Gospel which God first made known in Paradise, and afterwards did spread it a broad by the Patriarchs and Prophets: shadowed it by Sacrifices and other Ceremonies of the Law; and lastly accomplished it by his only begotten Son Christ our Lord.

Question 20, from Question 20

Are Is then Salvation restored by Christ to all men then, as they who perished in Adam?saved by Christ?

No; only Not to all: but to those only who by a true Faith are ingrafted into him, and receive all his benefits.by a true faith.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 20

Are all men then, as they perished in Adam, saved by Christ?

No; only those who are ingrafted into him, and receive all his benefits, by a true faith.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 20

Is then Salvation restored by Christ to all men who perished in Adam?

Not to all: but to those only who by a true Faith are ingrafted into him, and receive his benefits.

Question 21, from Question 21

What is true Faith?

True faith It is not only a certain knowledg, whereby I hold for truth surely assent to all that things which God hath revealed to unto us in his Word, but also an assured confidence, which the Holy Ghost works by the Gospel, trust kindled in my heart by the Holy Ghost, through the Gospel, whereby I make my repose in God, being assuredly resolved that Remission of Sins, everlasting Righteousness, and life is given not only to others only, but to me also, remission of sin, everlasting righteousness salvation, are given by God, merely and that freely through the Mercy of grace, only God, for for the sake of Christ’s Merits of Christ alone.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 21

What is true faith?

True faith is not only a certain knowledge, whereby I hold for truth all that God has revealed to us in his word, but also an assured confidence, which the Holy Ghost works by the Gospel, in my heart; that not only to others, but to me also, remission of sin, everlasting righteousness and salvation, are freely given by God, merely of grace, only for the sake of Christ’s merits.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 21

What is Faith?

It is not only a knowledg, whereby I surely assent to all things which God hath revealed unto us in his Word, but also an assured trust kindled in my heart by the Holy Ghost, through the Gospel, whereby I make my repose in God, being assuredly resolved that Remission of Sins, everlasting Righteousness, and life is given not to others only, but to me also, and that freely through the Mercy of God, for for the Merits of Christ alone.

Question 22, from Question 22

What is then are those things which are necessary for a Christian man to believe?

All things which are promised us in the Gospel: which the sum whereof is briefly comprised in the Articles of our the Catholick and undoubted Christian Faith briefly teach us.of all true Christians, commonly called the Creed. I believe in God the Father Almighty, maker of Heaven and Earth; and in Jesus Christ his only Son, our Lord, which was conceived by the Holy Ghost, born of the Virgin Mary, suffered under Pontius Pilate, was crucified, dead & buried, he descended into Hell; the third day he arose again from the dead, and ascended into Heaven, fro whence he shall come to judge both the quick and the dead. I believe in the Holy Ghost, the Holy Catholick Church, the Communion of Saints, the forgiveness of sins, the Resurrection of the Body, and the life everlasting. Amen.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 22

What is then necessary for a Christian to believe?

All things promised us in the gospel, which the articles of our Catholic undoubted Christian faith briefly teach us.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 22

What are those things which are necessary for a Christian man to believe?

All things which are promised us in the Gospel: the sum whereof is briefly comprised in the Articles of the Catholick and undoubted Faith of all true Christians, commonly called the Creed. I believe in God the Father Almighty, maker of Heaven and Earth; and in Jesus Christ his only Son, our Lord, which was conceived by the Holy Ghost, born of the Virgin Mary, suffered under Pontius Pilate, was crucified, dead & buried, he descended into Hell; the third day he arose again from the dead, and ascended into Heaven, fro whence he shall come to judge both the quick and the dead. I believe in the Holy Ghost, the Holy Catholick Church, the Communion of Saints, the forgiveness of sins, the Resurrection of the Body, and the life everlasting. Amen.

Question 23, from Question 24

Into how are these articles many parts is this Creed divided?

Into three: parts; the first is of God the eternal Father, and our Creation: the second of God the Son and our Redemption: the third of God the Holy Ghost, and our Sanctification.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 24

How are these articles divided?

Into three parts; the first is of God the Father, and our creation; the second of God the Son, and our redemption; the third of God the Holy Ghost, and our sanctification.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 23

Into how many parts is this Creed divided?

Into three: the first of the eternal Father, and our Creation: the second of the Son and our Redemption: the third of the Holy Ghost, and our Sanctification.

Question 24, from Question 25

Since Seing there is but one only divine essence, substance of God, why speakest namest thou of those three, the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost?

Because God hath so revealed manifested himself in his Word, that these three distinct Persons are the that one only true and eternal everlasting God.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 25

Since there is but one only divine essence, why speakest thou of Father, Son, and Holy Ghost?

Because God hath so revealed himself in his word, that these three distinct persons are the one only true and eternal God.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 24

Seing there is but one only substance of God, why namest thou those three, the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost?

Because God hath so manifested himself in his Word, that these three distinct Persons are that one true everlasting God.

Question 25, from Question 26

What believest thou when thou sayest, I believe in God the Father Almighty, maker of Heaven and Earth?

That I believe the eternal everlasting Father of our Lord Iesus Christ, who of nothing made made of nothing Heaven and Earth, with all that is are in them; who likewise upholdeth and governeth the same by his eternal Counsel and Providence. is for the sake of Christ his Son, This God I believe to be my God and my Father on whom I rely entirely, for Christ sake; and therefore so trust in him, and rely on him, that I have make no doubt but he will provide me with all all things necessary both for my soul and body; and further, that he will make whatever whatsoever evils he upon sendeth on me in this valley of tears, troublesome life, he will turn out them to my advantage; for safety; seing both he is able to do it, as being almighty God Almighty, and willing to do it, as being a faithful bountiful Father.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 26

What believest thou when thou sayest, “I believe in God the Father Almighty, maker of heaven and earth?”

That the eternal Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, (who of nothing made heaven and earth, with all that is in them: who likewise upholds and governs the same by his eternal counsel and providence) is for the sake of Christ his Son, my God and my Father; on whom I rely so entirely, that I have no doubt, but he will provide me with all things necessary for soul and body: and further that he will make whatever evils he sends upon me, in this valley of tears, turn out to my advantage; for he is able to do it, being almighty God, and willing, being a faithful Father.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 25

What believest thou when thou sayest, I believe in God the Father Almighty, maker of Heaven and Earth?

I believe the everlasting Father of our Lord Iesus Christ, who made of nothing Heaven and Earth, with all that are in them; who likewise upholdeth and governeth the same by his eternal Counsel and Providence. This God I believe to be my God and Father for Christ sake; and therefore so trust in him, and rely on him, that I make no doubt but he will provide all things necessary both for my soul and body; and further, whatsoever evils he sendeth on me in this troublesome life, he will turn them to my safety; seing both he is able to do it, as being God Almighty, and willing to do it, as being a bountiful Father.

Question 26, from Question 27

What dost thou mean by is the Providence of God?

The almighty and everywhere present Power of God, every where present, whereby he doth as it were by his hand he upholds uphold and governs govern Heaven earth, all and Earth, with all the Creatures therein, so that herbs and grass, those things which grow in the Earth, as likewise rain and drowth, fruitfulness and barren years, barenness, meat and and drink, health and sickness, riches and poverty; yea, and in a word, all things come not rashly and by chance, but by his fatherly hand.Counsel and will.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 27

What dost thou mean by the providence of God?

The almighty and everywhere present power of God; whereby, as it were by his hand, he upholds and governs heaven, earth, and all creatures; so that herbs and grass, rain and drought, fruitful and barren years, meat and drink, health and sickness, riches and poverty, yea, and all things come not by chance, but by his fatherly hand.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 26

What is the Providence of God?

The almighty Power of God, every where present, whereby he doth as it were by his hand uphold and govern Heaven and Earth, with all the Creatures therein, so that those things which grow in the Earth, as likewise rain and drowth, fruitfulness and barenness, meat and and drink, health and sickness, riches and poverty; in a word, all things come not rashly and by chance, but by his fatherly Counsel and will.

Question 27, from Question 28

What advantage is it to us to know that God has created, doth this knowledg of the Creation and by his Providence doth still uphold all things.of God profit us?

That in adversity we may be patient, in adversity; and thankful in prosperity, and that all things, have hereafter our chiefest hope reposed in God our most faithful Father; being sure that there is nothing which may hereafter befall us, we place our firm trust in our faithful God and Father, that nothing shall separate withdraw us from his love; since forasmuch as all creatures are so in his hand, Power, that without his Will they cannot are not able not only to do any thing, but not so much as once to move.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 28

What advantage is it to us to know that God has created, and by his providence doth still uphold all things.

That we may be patient in adversity; thankful in prosperity; and that in all things, which may hereafter befall us, we place our firm trust in our faithful God and Father, that nothing shall separate us from his love; since all creatures are so in his hand, that without his will they cannot so much as move.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 27

What doth this knowledg of the Creation and Providence of God profit us?

That in adversity we may be patient, and thankful in prosperity, and have hereafter our chiefest hope reposed in God our most faithful Father; being sure that there is nothing which may withdraw us from his love; forasmuch as all creatures are so in his Power, that without his Will they are not able not only to do any thing, but not so much as once to move.

Question 28, from Question 29

Why is the Son of God called Jesus, that is, a Saviour?

Because he saveth us and delivereth us from our sins; and likewise, because we ought not to seek, can find salvation in neither ought any safety to be sought for from any other, nor can elsewhere be found.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 29

Why is the Son of God called Jesus, that is a Saviour?

Because he saveth us, and delivereth us from our sins; and likewise, because we ought not to seek, neither can find salvation in any other.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 28

Why is the Son of God called Jesus, that is, a Saviour?

Because he saveth us from our sins; neither ought any safety to be sought for from any other, nor can elsewhere be found.

Question 29, from Question 30

Do such they then believe in Jesus the only Saviour Jesus, who seek their salvation for happiness and happiness safety of the Saints, or of themselves, or anywhere else where?

They do not; No: for though although in word they boast themselves of him in words, as their only Saviour, yet in deeds indeed they deny Jesus the only deliverer and Saviour Jesus: for one of these two things it must needs be true, that either Jesus is not a complete perfect Saviour, or that they, those who by imbrace him as their Saviour with a true faith, receive this Saviour, must find possess all things in him necessary to their which are required unto Salvation.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 30

Do such then believe in Jesus the only Saviour, who seek their salvation and happiness of saints, of themselves, or anywhere else?

They do not; for though they boast of him in words, yet in deeds they deny Jesus the only deliverer and Saviour; for one of these two things must be true, that either Jesus is not a complete Saviour; or that they, who by a true faith receive this Saviour, must find all things in him necessary to their salvation.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 29

Do they then believe in the only Saviour Jesus, who seek for happiness and safety of the Saints, or of themselves, or else where?

No: for although in word they boast themselves of him as their only Saviour, yet indeed they deny the only Saviour Jesus: for it must needs be that either Jesus is not a perfect Saviour, or that those who imbrace him as their Saviour with a true faith, possess all things in him which are required unto Salvation.

Question 30, from Question 31

Why is he called Christ, that is, anointed?

Because he is was ordained of God the Father, and anointed with of the holy Ghost to be our the chief Prophet and Teacher, who fully revealed to hath opened unto us the secret Counsel, and & all the will of God his Father concerning our Redemption, and to be our only the high Preist, who by the with that one only Sacrifice of his Body hath redeemed us, and makes continual doth continually make Intercession with the to his Father for us; and also to be our eternal a King, who governs ruleth us by his Word and Spirit, and who defendeth and preserves us in (the enjoyment of) maintaineth that Salvation which he hath purchased for us.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 31

Why is he called Christ, that is, anointed?

Because he is ordained of God the Father, and anointed with the Holy Ghost, to be our chief Prophet and teacher; who has fully revealed to us the secret counsel and will of God concerning our redemption; and to be our only High Priest, who by the one sacrifice of his body, has redeemed us, and makes continual intercession with the Father for us; and also to be our eternal King, who governs us by his word and spirit; and who defends and preserves us in (the enjoyment of) that salvation, he has purchased for us.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 30

Why is he called Christ, that is, anointed?

Because he was ordained of the Father, and anointed of the holy Ghost the chief Prophet and Teacher, who hath opened unto us the secret Counsel, & all the will of his Father concerning our Redemption, and the high Preist, who with that one only Sacrifice of his Body hath redeemed us, and doth continually make Intercession to his Father for us; and a King, who ruleth us by his Word and Spirit, and defendeth and maintaineth that Salvation which he hath purchased for us.

Question 31, from Question 32

But why art thou called a Christian?

Because through Faith I am a member of Jesus Christ, by faith, and thus am partaker of his anointing, that so both I may confess his name, and present myself my self unto him a living lively Sacrifice of thankfulness, to him: and also that with a free and good conscience I may in this life fight against Sin and Satan in this life: with free and good conscience, and afterwards reign enjoy an everlasting Kingdom with him eternally, over all creatures.Christ.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 32

But why art thou called a Christian?

Because I am a member of Christ by faith, and thus am partaker of his anointing; that so I may confess his name and present myself a living sacrifice of thankfulness to him: and also that with a free and good conscience I may fight against sin and Satan, in this life: and afterwards reign with him eternally, over all creatures.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 31

But why art thou called a Christian?

Because through Faith I am a member of Jesus Christ, and partaker of his anointing, that both I may confess his name, and present my self unto him a lively Sacrifice of thankfulness, and also may in this life fight against Sin and Satan with free and good conscience, and afterwards enjoy an everlasting Kingdom with Christ.

Question 32, from Question 33

Why For what cause is Christ called the only begotten Son of God, since when we also are also the children Sons of God?

Because Christ alone is the eternal and natural Son of God; but the eternal Father, and we are children but Sons adopted of God, the Father by Grace for his sake.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 33

Why is Christ called the only begotten Son of God since we are also the children of God?

Because Christ alone is the eternal and natural Son of God; but we are children adopted of God, by grace, for his sake.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 32

For what cause is Christ called the only begotten Son of God, when we also are the Sons of God?

Because Christ alone is the eternal and natural Son of the eternal Father, and we are but Sons adopted of the Father by Grace for his sake.

Question 33, from Question 34

Wherefore callest thou him our Lord?

Because he hath redeemed us, both soul body, from all sins, redeeming and ransoming both our Body and Soul from Sin, not with Gold nor Silver, but with his precious Blood, and hath delivered delivering us from all the Power of the Devil, and thus hath made set us his own property.free to serve him.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 34

Wherefore callest thou him our Lord?

Because he hath redeemed us, both soul and body, from all our sins, not with gold or silver, but with his precious blood, and hath delivered us from all the power of the devil; and thus hath made us his own property.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 33

Wherefore callest thou him our Lord?

Because he redeeming and ransoming both our Body and Soul from Sin, not with Gold nor Silver, but with his precious Blood, and delivering us from all the Power of the Devil, hath set us free to serve him.

Question 34, from Question 35

What is the meaning of these words—“He believest thou when thou sayest, He was conceived by the Holy Ghost, and born of the Virgin Mary?

That God’s eternal the Son of God, who is and continueth true and eternal everlasting God, took upon him the very Nature of man, of the flesh and blood of the Virgin Mary, by through the operation working of the Holy Ghost; Holy-Ghost, that withal he might also be the true Seed of David, like unto his Brethren in all things Sin excepted.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 35

What is the meaning of these words—“He was conceived by the Holy Ghost, born of the Virgin Mary?”

That God’s eternal Son, who is, and continueth true and eternal God, took upon him the very nature of man, of the flesh and blood of the Virgin Mary, by the operation of the Holy Ghost; that he might also be the true seed of David, like unto his brethren in all things, sin excepted.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 34

What believest thou when thou sayest, He was conceived by the Holy Ghost, and born of the Virgin Mary?

That the Son of God, who is and continueth true and everlasting God, took the very Nature of man, of the flesh and blood of the Virgin Mary, through the working of the Holy-Ghost, that withal he might be the true Seed of David, like unto his Brethren in all things Sin excepted.

Question 35, from Question 36

What profit dost takest thou receive by Christ’s holy Conception and Nativity?

That he is our Mediator, and doth cover with his innocence Innocency and perfect Holiness covers my Sins, in which I was conceived, that they may not come in the Sight of God.my sins, wherein I was conceived and brought forth!

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 36

What profit dost thou receive by Christ’s holy conception and nativity?

That he is our mediator; and with his innocence and perfect holiness, covers in the sight of God, my sins, wherein I was conceived and brought forth!

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 35

What profit takest thou by Christ’s holy Conception and Nativity?

That he is our Mediator, and doth cover with his Innocency and perfect Holiness my Sins, in which I was conceived, that they may not come in the Sight of God.

Question 36, from Question 37

What dost believest thou when thou understand by the words sayest he suffered.

That he all the time that of his life which he lived on lead in the Earth, but especially at the end of his life, in body and soul, thereof, sustained the wrath of God, both in body and soul, against the sins sin of all mankind, that so he might by his passion, as the only propitiatory sacrifice, he might redeem deliver our body and soul from everlasting damnation, and obtain for purchase us the favour of God, righteousness, and eternal everlasting life.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 37

What dost thou understand by the words “He suffered?”

That he, all the time that he lived on earth, but especially at the end of his life, sustained in body and soul, the wrath of God against the sins of all mankind: that so by his passion, as the only propitiatory sacrifice, he might redeem our body and soul from everlasting damnation, and obtain for us the favour of God, righteousness and eternal life.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 36

What believest thou when thou sayest he suffered.

That he all the time of his life which he lead in the Earth, but especially at the end thereof, sustained the wrath of God, both in body and soul, against the sin of mankind, that he might by his passion, as the only propitiatory sacrifice, deliver our body and soul from everlasting damnation, and purchase us the favour of God, righteousness, and everlasting life.

Question 37, from Question 38

Why did For what cause should he suffer under Pontius Pilate, as being his judge?Judg?

That he being innocent and yet condemned by before a temporal civil Judg might thereby free deliver us from the severe Judgment of God to which we were exposed.remained for all men.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 38

Why did he suffer under Pontius Pilate, as his judge?

That he, being innocent, and yet condemned by a temporal judge, might thereby free us from the severe judgment of God to which we were exposed.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 37

For what cause should he suffer under Pilate, as being his Judg?

That he being innocent and condemned before a civil Judg might deliver us from the severe Judgment of God which remained for all men.

Question 38, from Question 39

But is there any thing more in his being crucified, it, that he was fastened to the Cross, than if he had died some suffered any other kind of death?

Yes There is more: for thereby by this I am assured that he took on him upon himself the curse which lay upon did ly on me; for the death of the Cross was accursed of God.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 39

Is there any thing more in his being crucified, than if he had died some other death?

Yes [there is]; for thereby I am assured, that he took on him the curse which lay upon me; for the death of the cross was accursed of God.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 38

But is there any more in it, that he was fastened to the Cross, than if he had suffered any other kind of death?

There is more: for by this I am assured that he took upon himself the curse which did ly on me; for the death of the Cross was accursed of God.

Question 39, from Question 40

Why was it necessary for Christ to humble himself even unto death?

Because with respect to the Justice and Truth of God satisfaction could by no other means be satisfied for our sins, could be made no otherwise, than but by the very death of the Son of God.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 40

Why was it necessary for Christ to humble himself even unto death?

Because with respect to the justice and truth of God, satisfaction for our sins could be made no otherwise, than by the death of the Son of God.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 39

Why was it necessary for Christ to humble himself unto death?

Because the Justice and Truth of God could by no other means be satisfied for our sins, but by the very death of the Son of God.

Question 40, from Question 41

Why To what end was he buried also?“buried?”

That thereby to prove he might manifest that he was really dead indeed.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 41

Why was he also “buried?”

Thereby to prove that he was really dead.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 40

To what end was he buried also?

That thereby he might manifest that he was dead indeed.

Question 41, from Question 42

But since then that Christ died for us, why must we also die?

Our death is not a satisfaction for our Sins, but only an the abolishing of Sin, and a our passage into eternal everlasting Life.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 42

Since then Christ died for us, why must we also die?

Our death is not a satisfaction for our sins, but only an abolishing of sin, and a passage into eternal life.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 41

But since that Christ died for us, why must we also die?

Our death is not a satisfaction for our Sins, but the abolishing of Sin, and our passage into everlasting Life.

Question 42, from Question 43

What further benefit do other commodity receive we receive from by the sacrifice and Death of Christ?on the cross?

That by the virtue thereof, of his Death our old man is crucified, dead, slain, and buried together with him, (figured out in holy Baptism) that so the corrupt inclinations of the flesh henceforth evil lusts and desires may no more not reign in us, but that we may offer ourselves our selves unto him a Sacrifice of thanksgiving.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 43

What further benefit do we receive from the sacrifice and death of Christ on the cross?

That by virtue thereof, our old man is crucified, dead, and buried with him; that so the corrupt inclinations of the flesh may no more reign in us; but that we may offer ourselves unto him a sacrifice of thanksgiving.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 42

What other commodity receive we by the Death of Christ?

That by the virtue of his Death our old man is crucified, slain, and buried together with him, (figured out in holy Baptism) that henceforth evil lusts and desires may not reign in us, but we may offer our selves unto him a Sacrifice of thanksgiving.

Question 43, from Question 44

Why is there added, he descended into Hell?

That in my greatest pains and most grevious temptations I may be assured, and wholly comfort myself in support my self with this comfort, that my Lord Jesus Christ hath delivered me (by his inexpressible anguish, pains, terrors, hellish agonies, in the unspeakable distresses, torments and terrors of his Soul, into which he was plunged during all his sufferings, but both before, and then especially when he hanged on the Cross) hath delivered me from the anguish straits and torments of Hell.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 44

Why is there added, “he descended into hell?”

That in my greatest temptations, I may be assured, and wholly comfort myself in this, that my Lord Jesus Christ, by his inexpressible anguish, pains, terrors, and hellish agonies, in which he was plunged during all his sufferings, but especially on the cross, hath delivered me from the anguish and torments of hell.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 43

Why is there added, he descended into Hell?

That in my greatest pains and most grevious temptations I may support my self with this comfort, that my Lord Jesus Christ hath delivered me (by the unspeakable distresses, torments and terrors of his Soul, into which he was plunged both before, and then especially when he hanged on the Cross) from the straits and torments of Hell.

Question 44, from Question 45

What doth the Resurrection of Christ profit us?

First, by his Resurrection he hath overcome vanquished death, that he might make us partakers of that Righteousness which he had purchased for gotten us by his death. secondly, Again, we are now also stirred up by his Power raised up to a new Life. and Lastly, the Resurrection of our head, Christ, is a sure Pledg unto us of our blessed glorious Resurrection.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 45

What doth the resurrection of Christ profit us?

First by his resurrection he hath overcome death, that he might make us partakers of that righteousness which he had purchased for us by his death; secondly, we are also by his power, raised up to a new life; and lastly, the resurrection of Christ is a sure pledge of our blessed resurrection.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 44

What doth the Resurrection of Christ profit us?

First, by his Resurrection he vanquished death, that he might make us partakers of that Righteousness which he had gotten us by his death. Again, we are now also stirred up by his Power to a new Life. Lastly, the Resurrection of our head, Christ, is a Pledg unto us of our glorious Resurrection.

Question 45, from Question 46

How dost thou understand these words, you that he ascended into Heaven?

That Christ, in sight of his Disciples looking on, was taken up from the Earth into Heaven, and that he continues yet still is there for our interest, sakes, and will be until he come again to judge the quick and the dead.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 46

How dost thou understand these words, “he ascended into heaven?”

That Christ, in sight of his disciples, was taken up from earth into heaven; and that he continues there for our interest, until he come again to judge the quick and the dead.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 45

How understand you that he ascended into Heaven?

That Christ, his Disciples looking on, was taken up from the Earth into Heaven, and yet still is there for our sakes, and will be until he come again to judge the quick and the dead.

Question 46, from Question 47

Is not Christ then with us even to then until the end of the World, as he hath promised?

Christ is very true God, and true Man, and very God: with respect so according to his human nature, he Manhood is no more not now on Earth, but with respect according to his Godhead, his Majesty, his Grace, and Spirit he is at no time absent from us.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 47

Is not Christ then with us even to the end of the world, as he hath promised?

Christ is very man and very God: with respect to his human nature, he is no more on earth; but with respect to his Godhead, majesty, grace and spirit, he is at no time absent from us.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 46

Is not Christ with us then until the end of the World, as he hath promised?

Christ is true God, and true Man, and so according to his Manhood is not now on Earth, but according to his Godhead, his Majesty, his Grace, and Spirit is at no time from us.

Question 47, from Question 48

But if his human nature is not present, wherever his Godhead is, Are not then these by this means the two natures in Christ separated from one another?pulled assunder, if his Humanity be not wheresoever his Divinity is?

Not at all; No; for since the Godhead seeing his Divinity is incomprehensible, and omnipresent, every where present, it must followeth necessarily follow that the same is not limited with without the bounds of his humane Nature which he assumed, took unto him, and yet remains is nevertheless in it, and abideth personally united to it.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 48

But if his human nature is not present, wherever his Godhead is, are not then these two natures in Christ separated from one another?

Not at all; for since the Godhead is incomprehensible and omnipresent, it must necessarily follow that the same is not limited with the human nature he assumed, and yet remains personally united to it.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 47

Are not by this means the two natures in Christ pulled assunder, if his Humanity be not wheresoever his Divinity is?

No; for seeing his Divinity is incomprehensible, and every where present, it followeth necessarily that the same is without the bounds of his humane Nature which he took unto him, and yet is nevertheless in it, and abideth personally united to it.

Question 48, from Question 49

Of What advantage to us is Christ’s Fruit doth the Ascension of Christ into Heaven bring unto us?

First that he is our advocate in the presence of maketh Intercession to his Father in Heaven secondly, for us; next that we have our Flesh in Heaven, that we may be confirmed thereby, as by a sure Pledge, that it shall come to passe that he as the who is our Head will also take up to himself, lift us up, his Members, unto him: thirdly, that he sendeth us his Spirit as an earnest, instead of a Pledge between him and us, by whose power forcible working we seek the which are above, Christ sitteth on after not earthly but heavenly things, where he himself is sitting at the right hand Right-Hand of God.and not things on earth.”

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 49

Of what advantage to us is Christ’s ascension into heaven?

First, that he is our advocate in the presence of his Father in heaven: secondly, that we have our flesh in heaven, as a sure pledge that he, as the head, will also take up to himself, us, his members: thirdly, that he sends us his spirit as an earnest, by whose power we “seek the things which are above, where Christ sitteth on the right hand of God, and not things on earth.”

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 48

What Fruit doth the Ascension of Christ into Heaven bring unto us?

First that he maketh Intercession to his Father in Heaven for us; next that we have our Flesh in Heaven, that we may be confirmed thereby, as by a sure Pledge, that it shall come to passe that he who is our Head will lift us up, his Members, unto him: thirdly, that he sendeth us his Spirit instead of a Pledge between him and us, by whose forcible working we seek after not earthly but heavenly things, where he himself is sitting at the Right-Hand of God.

Question 49, from Question 50

Why is it added, “and further said, he sitteth at the right hand Right-Hand of God?

Because Christ therefore is ascended into Heaven, for this end, to shew there that he might there appear as is the Head of his Church, by whom the Father governeth all things.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 50

Why is it added, “and sitteth at the right hand of God?”

Because Christ is ascended into heaven for this end, that he might there appear as head of his church, by whom the Father governs all things.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 49

Why is it further said, he sitteth at the Right-Hand of God?

Because Christ therefore is ascended into Heaven, to shew there that he is the Head of his Church, by whom the Father governeth all things.

Question 50, from Question 51

What profit is this Glory of Christ, our Head Christ unto us?

First, that by through his Holy Spirit he poureth out heavenly graces upon us his Members and heavenly Graces, then that he shieldeth and defendeth us by his Power he defends and preserves us against all our Enemies.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 51

What profit is this glory of Christ, our head, unto us?

First, that by his holy spirit he poureth out heavenly graces upon us his members: and then that by his power he defends and preserves us against all enemies.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 50

What profit is this Glory of our Head Christ unto us?

First, that through his Holy Spirit he poureth upon us his Members heavenly Graces, then that he shieldeth and defendeth us by his Power against all our Enemies.

Question 51, from Question 52

What Comfort is it to thee that hast thou by the coming of Christ shall come again to judge the quick and the dead?

That in all my sorrows Miseries and Persecutions, with uplifted head I look with my Head lifted up, for the very same person, who before offered yielded himself for my sake, to unto the tribunal Judgment of God for me, and hath removed took away all curse Malediction from me, to come as Judge from Heaven who shall cast to throw all his and my Enemies into everlasting condemnation, Pains; but shall to translate me with all his chosen ones to unto himself, into heavenly Celestiall Joys, and everlasting Glory.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 52

What comfort is it to thee that “Christ shall come again to judge the quick and the dead?”

That in all my sorrows and persecutions, with uplifted head I look for the very same person, who before offered himself for my sake, to the tribunal of God, and hath removed all curse from me, to come as judge from heaven: who shall cast all his and my enemies into everlasting condemnation, but shall translate me with all his chosen ones to himself, into heavenly joys and glory.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 51

What Comfort hast thou by the coming of Christ again to judge the quick and the dead?

That in all my Miseries and Persecutions, I look with my Head lifted up, for the very same who before yielded himself unto the Judgment of God for me, and took away all Malediction from me, to come Judge from Heaven to throw all his and my Enemies into everlasting Pains; but to translate me with all his chosen unto himself, into Celestiall Joys, and everlasting Glory.

Question 52, from Question 53

What dost believest thou believe concerning the Holy Ghost?

First, that He is true and Coeternal God, with the eternal Father, and the Son; secondly, that he is also given unto me, to make me, by through a true Faith, Partaker of Christ and all his Benefits, that he may to comfort me, and to abide with me for ever.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 53

What dost thou believe concerning the Holy Ghost?

First, that he is true and co-eternal God with the Father and the Son: secondly, that he is also given me, to make me by a true faith, partaker of Christ and all his benefits, that he may comfort me and abide with me for ever.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 52

What believest thou concerning the Holy Ghost?

First, that He is true and Coeternal God, with the eternal Father, and the Son; secondly, that he is also given unto me, to make me, through a true Faith, Partaker of Christ and all his Benefits, to comfort me, and to abide with me for ever.

Question 53, from Question 54

What believest thou concerning the Holy Catholic and Catholick Church of Christ?

I believe that the Son of God doth from the beginning to the end of the World to the gathers, defends, and preserves End thereof, gather, defend, and preserve unto himself by his Spirit and Word, out of the whole human race, Mankind, a church Company chosen to everlasting Life, and agreeing in true Faith; and that I am a lively Member of that Company, and for ever a living member thereof.so shal remain for ever.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 54

What believest thou concerning the “Holy Catholic Church” of Christ.

That the Son of God from the beginning to the end of the world, gathers, defends, and preserves to himself by his spirit and word, out of the whole human race, a church chosen to everlasting life, agreeing in true faith; and that I am and for ever shall remain, a living member thereof.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 53

What believest thou concerning the Holy and Catholick Church of Christ?

I believe that the Son of God doth from the beginning of the World to the End thereof, gather, defend, and preserve unto himself by his Spirit and Word, out of whole Mankind, a Company chosen to everlasting Life, and agreeing in true Faith; and that I am a lively Member of that Company, and so shal remain for ever.

Question 54, from Question 55

What do you understand by mean those words, The Communion of Saints?

First, that all and every one who being members of Christ, believeth, are in common Partakers of him, Christ and of all his riches Graces, as being his Members; and gifts: secondly, then that every one must know it to be his duty, ought readily and chearfully to employ his gifts, for bestow the Gifts and Graces which they have received to the advantage common Commodity and salvation Safety of other members.all.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 55

What do you understand by “the communion of saints?”

First, that all and every one who believes, being members of Christ, are in common, partakers of him, and of all his riches and gifts: secondly, that every one must know it to be his duty, readily and cheerfully to employ his gifts, for the advantage and salvation of other members.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 54

What mean those words, The Communion of Saints?

First, that all and every one who believeth, are in common Partakers of Christ and all his Graces, as being his Members; and then that every one ought readily and chearfully to bestow the Gifts and Graces which they have received to the common Commodity and Safety of all.

Question 55, from Question 56

What believest thou concerning “the forgiveness Remission of Sins?

That God, for the sake of Christ’s will no more remember Satisfaction made by Christ, hath put out all the Remembrance of my Sins, neither my corrupt nature, against which and also of that Corruption within me wherewith I have to struggle must fight all my life long; but will graciously impute to time, and doth freely indow me with the Righteousness of Christ, that I may never be condemned before the tribunal of God.come not at any time into Judgment.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 56

What believest thou concerning “the forgiveness of sins?”

That God, for the sake of Christ’s satisfaction, will no more remember my sins, neither my corrupt nature, against which I have to struggle all my life long; but will graciously impute to me the righteousness of Christ, that I may never be condemned before the tribunal of God.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 55

What believest thou concerning Remission of Sins?

That God, for the Satisfaction made by Christ, hath put out all the Remembrance of my Sins, and also of that Corruption within me wherewith I must fight all my life time, and doth freely indow me with the Righteousness of Christ, that I come not at any time into Judgment.

Question 56, from Question 57

What Comfort doth hast thou by the Resurrection of the body” afford thee?Flesh?

That not only my Soul, after this life it shall depart out of my Body, shall presently be immediately taken up to Christ, its head; but also, that this my body, Flesh also, being raised up by the Power of Christ, shall be reunited with again united to my Soul, and shall be made like unto to the glorious Body of Christ.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 57

What comfort doth the “resurrection of the body” afford thee?

That not only my soul after this life shall be immediately taken up to Christ its head; but also, that this my body, being raised by the power of Christ, shall be reunited with my soul, and made like unto the glorious body of Christ.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 56

What Comfort hast thou by the Resurrection of the Flesh?

That not only my Soul, after it shall depart out of my Body, shall presently be taken up to Christ, but that this my Flesh also, being raised up by the Power of Christ, shall be again united to my Soul, and shall be made like to the glorious Body of Christ.

Question 57, from Question 58

What Comfort takest thou from of the Article of everlasting Life?everlasting?”

That since forasmuch as I now feel already in my Heart the beginning of eternal joy, everlasting Life, it shall at length come to pass that after this Life I shall inherit enjoy full and perfect salvation, Bliss, wherein I may magnify God for ever, which Blessedness verily neither Eye hath not seen, nor Ear heard, neither hath it entered into the heart of to conceive! and that, to praise God therein for ever.any Man in thought conceived it.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 58

What comfort takest thou from the article of “life everlasting?”

That since I now feel in my heart the beginning of eternal joy, after this life, I shall inherit perfect salvation, which “eye hath not seen, nor ear heard, neither hath it entered into the heart of man” to conceive! and that, to praise God therein for ever.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 57

What Comfort takest thou of the Article of everlasting Life?

That forasmuch as I feel already in my Heart the beginning of everlasting Life, it shall at length come to pass that after this Life I shall enjoy full and perfect Bliss, wherein I may magnify God for ever, which Blessedness verily neither Eye hath seen, nor Ear heard, neither hath any Man in thought conceived it.

Question 58, from Question 59

No change, but in spelling and punctuation.

But when thou believest all these things, what doth it profit redoundeth thence unto thee?now that thou believest all this?

That I am righteous in Christ before God, and an Heir of eternal Life.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 59

But what doth it profit thee now that thou believest all this?

That I am righteous in Christ, before God, and an heir of eternal life.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 58

But when thou believest all these things, what profit redoundeth thence unto thee?

That I am righteous in Christ before God, and an Heir of eternal Life.

Question 59, from Question 60

How art thou righteous before God?

Only by a true Faith in Jesus Christ Jesus. So that although my Concience accuse me that I have grossly transgressed grievously trespassed against all the Commandments of God, and have not kept none one of them, and further am still inclined as yet prone to all Evil; yet notwithstanding God, without any merit if I embrace these Benefits of mine, but only of mere grace, grants Christ with a true Confidence and Perswasion of mind, the full and imputes to me, perfect Satisfaction, Righteousness and Holiness of Christ, even without any Merit of Mine, of the meer Mercy of God is imputed and given unto me, and that so, as if neither I never had had, nor committed any Sin, neither any Corruption did stick unto me; yea as if I my self had fully perfectly accomplished all that Obedience which Christ hath accomplished for me.inasmuch as I embrace such benefit with a believing heart.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 60

How art thou righteous before God?

Only by a true faith in Jesus Christ: so that, though my conscience accuse me, that I have grossly transgressed all the commands of God, and kept none of them, and am still inclined to all evil; notwithstanding, God, without any merit of mine, but only of mere grace, grants and imputes to me, the perfect satisfaction, righteousness and holiness of Christ; even so, as if I never had had, nor committed any sin: yea, as if I had fully accomplished all that obedience which Christ hath accomplished for me; inasmuch as I embrace such benefit with a believing heart.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 59

How art thou righteous before God?

Only by Faith in Christ Jesus. So that although my Concience accuse me that I have grievously trespassed against all the Commandments of God, and have not kept one of them, and further am as yet prone to all Evil; yet notwithstanding if I embrace these Benefits of Christ with a true Confidence and Perswasion of mind, the full and perfect Satisfaction, Righteousness and Holiness of Christ, without any Merit of Mine, of the meer Mercy of God is imputed and given unto me, and that so, as if neither I had committed any Sin, neither any Corruption did stick unto me; yea as if I my self had perfectly accomplished that Obedience which Christ accomplished for me.

Question 60, from Question 61

What sayest Why affirmest thou that thou art made Righteous by Faith only?

Not for that I am acceptable to please God on account of through the Worthiness of my meer Faith, but because only the Satisfaction, Righteousness and Holiness of Christ is my Righteousness before God, and that I cannot receive and take hold of it, or apply the same to myself it unto my self any other way than by Faith.only.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 61

What sayest thou, that thou art righteous by faith only?

Not that I am acceptable to God, on account of the worthiness of my faith; but because only the satisfaction righteousness, and holiness of Christ is my righteousness before God; and that I cannot receive and apply the same to myself any other way than by faith only.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 60

Why affirmest thou that thou art made Righteous by Faith only?

Not for that I please God through the Worthiness of meer Faith, but because only the Satisfaction, Righteousness and Holiness of Christ is my Righteousness before God, and I cannot take hold of it, or apply it unto my self any other way than by Faith.

Question 61, from Question 62

But Why cannot our good Works be the whole, Righteousness, or some part of our Righteousness before God?

Because that the Righteousness which can be approved of must stand fast before the tribunal Judgment of God, must be absolutely perfect, and respects conformable in all Points perfect and agreeable to the divine Law and also, that of God. Now our best Works, even the best of them, are imperfect in this Life, are all imperfect and defiled with Sin.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 62

But why cannot our good works be the whole, or part of our righteousness before God?

Because that the righteousness, which can be approved of before the tribunal of God, must be absolutely perfect, and in all respects conformable to the divine law: and also, that our best works in this life are all imperfect and defiled with sin.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 61

Why cannot our good Works be Righteousness, or some part of Righteousness before God?

Because that Righteousness which must stand fast before the Judgment of God, must be in all Points perfect and agreeable to the Law of God. Now our Works, even the best of them, are imperfect in this Life, and defiled with Sin.

Question 62, from Question 63

What! do not How is it that our good Works merit which yet nothing, seeing God promiseth that he will give a Reward for them both in this Life, and in a future the Life to come?

This That Reward is not given of merit, but of Grace.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 63

What! do not our good works merit, which yet God will reward in this and in a future life?

This reward is not of merit, but of grace.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 62

How is it that our good Works merit nothing, seeing God promiseth that he will give a Reward for them both in this Life, and in the Life to come?

That Reward is not given of merit, but of Grace.

Question 63, from Question 64

But doth not this Doctrine make Men careless and profane?profain?

By No, means: For neither can it is impossible that those, be but they who are implanted incorporated into Christ by a true through Faith, should not bring forth the Fruits of Thankfulness.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 64

But doth not this doctrine make men careless and profane?

By no means: for it is impossible that those, who are implanted into Christ by a true faith, should not bring forth fruits of thankfulness.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 63

But doth not this Doctrine make Men careless and profain?

No, For neither can it be but they who are incorporated into Christ through Faith, should bring forth the Fruits of Thankfulness.

Question 64, from Question 65

Since Seeing then we are made that only Faith maketh us Partakers of Christ and all his Benefits, by faith only, whence doth this faith it proceed?

From the Holy Ghost who works faith kindleth it in our Hearts by the preaching of the Gospel, and other Ordinances, and confirmeth it by the use of the Sacraments.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 65

Since then we are made partakers of Christ and all his benefits by faith only, whence doth this faith proceed?

From the Holy Ghost, who works faith in our hearts by the preaching of the gospel, and confirms it by the use of the sacraments.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 64

Seeing then that only Faith maketh us Partakers of Christ and his Benefits, whence doth it proceed?

From the Holy Ghost who kindleth it in our Hearts by the preaching of the Gospel, and other Ordinances, and confirmeth it by the use of the Sacraments.

Question 65, from Question 66

What are the Sacraments?

The sacraments They are holy visible sacred Signes, and Seals, appointed set before our Eyes, and ordained of God for this end, cause, that by the use thereof, he may the more fully declare and seal to us by them the Promise of the his Gospel viz. unto us, to wit, that he grants us giveth freely the Remission of Sins, and Life eternal, for the sake of that everlasting, not only to his all in general, but to every one in particular that believeth, for that only Sacrifice of Christ which he accomplished on upon the Cross.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 66

What are the sacraments?

The sacraments are holy visible signs and seals, appointed of God for this end, that by the use thereof, he may the more fully declare and seal to us the promise of the gospel, viz. that he grants us freely the remission of sin, and life eternal, for the sake of that one sacrifice of Christ, accomplished on the cross.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 65

What are the Sacraments?

They are sacred Signes, and Seals, set before our Eyes, and ordained of God for this cause, that he may declare and seal by them the Promise of his Gospel unto us, to wit, that he giveth freely Remission of Sins, and Life everlasting, not only to his all in general, but to every one in particular that believeth, for that only Sacrifice of Christ which he accomplished upon the Cross.

Question 66, from Question 67

Are Doth then both the Word and Sacraments then, ordained and appointed for this tend to that End, that they may direct as to lead our Faith to unto the Sacrifice of Jesus Christ finished on the Cross as to the only ground of our Salvation?

Yes, indeed: It is even so; for the Holy Ghost teacheth us in by the Gospel, and assureth us by the Sacraments, that the whole of our depends upon that one Salvation of all of us standeth in the only Sacrifice of Christ which he offered for us on upon the Cross.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 67

Are both word and sacraments, then, ordained and appointed for this end, that they may direct our faith to the sacrifice of Jesus Christ on the cross, as the only ground of our salvation?

Yes, indeed: for the Holy Ghost teaches us in the gospel, and assures us by the sacraments, that the whole of our salvation depends upon that one sacrifice of Christ which he offered for us on the cross.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 66

Doth then both the Word and Sacraments tend to that End, as to lead our Faith unto the Sacrifice of Christ finished on the Cross as to the only ground of our Salvation?

It is even so; for the Holy Ghost teacheth us by the Gospel, and assureth us by the Sacraments, that the Salvation of all of us standeth in the only Sacrifice of Christ offered for us upon the Cross.

Question 67, from Question 68

How many Sacraments has hath Christ instituted ordained in the new covenant, or Testament?

Two; namely, holy Baptism, and the holy Lord’s Supper.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 68

How many sacraments has Christ instituted in the new covenant, or testament?

Two: namely, holy baptism and the holy supper.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 67

How many Sacraments hath Christ ordained in the new Testament?

Two; Baptism, and the Lord’s Supper.

Question 68, only in An Orthodox Catechism (1680)

What is Baptism?

Immersion or dipping of the Person in Water in the Name of the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost, by such who are duly qualified by Christ.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563) has no question like it.

What is Baptism?

Immersion or dipping of the Person in Water in the Name of the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost, by such who are duly qualified by Christ.

What is Baptism?

Immersion or dipping of the Person in Water in the Name of the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost, by such who are duly qualified by Christ.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563) has no question like it.

What is Baptism?

Immersion or dipping of the Person in Water in the Name of the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost, by such who are duly qualified by Christ.

Question 69, only in An Orthodox Catechism (1680)

Who are the proper Subjects of this Ordinance?

Those who do actually profess Repentance towards God, Faith in, and Obedience to our Lord Jesus Christ.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563) has no question like it.

Who are the proper Subjects of this Ordinance?

Those who do actually profess Repentance towards God, Faith in, and Obedience to our Lord Jesus Christ.

Who are the proper Subjects of this Ordinance?

Those who do actually profess Repentance towards God, Faith in, and Obedience to our Lord Jesus Christ.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563) has no question like it.

Who are the proper Subjects of this Ordinance?

Those who do actually profess Repentance towards God, Faith in, and Obedience to our Lord Jesus Christ.

Question 70, from Question 74

Are no Infants also to be baptized?

Yes: None by no means; for since they, as well as the adult, are included we have neither Precept nor Example for that Practice in all the covenant and church Book of God.and since redemption from sin by the blood of Christ, and the Holy Ghost, the author of faith, is promised to them no less than to the adult; they must therefore by baptism, as a sign of the covenant, be also admitted into the Christian church; and be distinguished from the children of infidels, as was done in the old covenant or testament by circumcision, instead of which, baptism is instituted in the new covenant.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 74

Are infants also to be baptized?

Yes: for since they, as well as the adult, are included in the covenant and church of God; and since redemption from sin by the blood of Christ, and the Holy Ghost, the author of faith, is promised to them no less than to the adult; they must therefore by baptism, as a sign of the covenant, be also admitted into the Christian church; and be distinguished from the children of infidels, as was done in the old covenant or testament by circumcision, instead of which, baptism is instituted in the new covenant.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 70

Are no Infants to be baptized?

None by no means; for we have neither Precept nor Example for that Practice in all the Book of God.

Question 71, only in An Orthodox Catechism (1680)

Doth the Scripture any where expressly forbid the Baptizing of Infants?

It is sufficient that the Divine Oracle commands the baptizing of Believers, unless we will make our selves wiser than what is written. Nadab and Abihu were not forbidden to offer strange Fire, yet for so doing they incurred God’s Wrath, because they were commanded to take Fire from the Altar.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563) has no question like it.

Doth the Scripture any where expressly forbid the Baptizing of Infants?

It is sufficient that the Divine Oracle commands the baptizing of Believers, unless we will make our selves wiser than what is written. Nadab and Abihu were not forbidden to offer strange Fire, yet for so doing they incurred God’s Wrath, because they were commanded to take Fire from the Altar.

Does the Scripture any where expressly forbid the Baptizing of Infants?

It is sufficient that the Divine Oracle commands the baptizing of Believers, unless we will make our selves wiser than what is written. Nadab and Abihu were not forbidden to offer strange Fire, yet for so doing they incurred God’s Wrath, because they were commanded to take Fire from the Altar.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563) has no question like it.

Does the Scripture any where expressly forbid the Baptizing of Infants?

It is sufficient that the Divine Oracle commands the baptizing of Believers, unless we will make our selves wiser than what is written. Nadab and Abihu were not forbidden to offer strange Fire, yet for so doing they incurred God’s Wrath, because they were commanded to take Fire from the Altar.

Question 72, only in An Orthodox Catechism (1680)

May not the Infant Seed of Believers under the Gospel be baptized as well as the Infant Seed of Abraham under the Law was circumcised?

No; For Abraham had a Command then from God to circumcise his Infant Seed, but Believers have no Command to baptise their Infants Seed under the Gospel.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563) has no question like it.

May not the Infant Seed of Believers under the Gospel be baptized as well as the Infant Seed of Abraham under the Law was circumcised?

No; For Abraham had a Command then from God to circumcise his Infant Seed, but Believers have no Command to baptise their Infants Seed under the Gospel.

May not the Infant Seed of Believers under the Gospel be baptized as well as the Infant Seed of Abraham under the Law was circumcised?

No; For Abraham had a Command then from God to circumcise his Infant Seed, but Believers have no Command to baptize their Infants Seed under the Gospel.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563) has no question like it.

May not the Infant Seed of Believers under the Gospel be baptized as well as the Infant Seed of Abraham under the Law was circumcised?

No; For Abraham had a Command then from God to circumcise his Infant Seed, but Believers have no Command to baptize their Infants Seed under the Gospel.

Question 73, only in An Orthodox Catechism (1680)

Seeing the Infants of Believers are in the Covenant of Grace with their Parents, as some say, why may not they be baptized under the Gospel, as well as Abrahams Infant Seed was circumcised under the Law?

By the Infants of Believers being in the Covenant of Grace, it must either be meant of the Covenant of Grace absolutely considered, and if so, then there is no total and final Apostacy of any Infant seed of Believers from the Covenant, but all must be saved then. Or, 2. They must mean conditionally, on consideration that when they come to years of maturity, they by true Faith, Love, and Holiness of life, taking hold of God’s Covenant of Grace, shall have the Priviledges of it. This being their sence, I then demand what real spiritual priviledg the Infant-Seed of Believers, as such, have more than the Infant Seed of Unbelievers, if they live also to years of maturity, and by true Faith and Love take hold of God’s Covenant? I further demand, whether the Seal of the Covenant do not under those considerations belong as much to the Children of Unbelievers as to the Children of Believers? yea, and more too, under consideration the Infant Seed of the Unbeliever should take hold of God’s Covenant, and the Believers Infant-Seed do not; as often this is seen to the sorrow of many Godly Parents. 3. Suppose all the Infant Seed of Believers absolutely in the Covenant of Grace; yet Believers under the Gospel ought no more to Baptise their Infant-Seed, than Lot to circumcise himself or his Infant-Seed, if he had had Males as well as Females, albeit nearly related to Abraham, yea, a Believer, and in the Covenant of Grace too: forasmuch as Circumcision was limited to Abraham and to his Family. Also by the same rule we may bring Infants to the Lord’s Table, forasmuch as the same qualifications are required to the due performance of Baptism, as there is to the Lord’s Supper. 4. We must know the Covenant made with Abraham had two parts: first, a spiritual, which consisted in God’s promising to be a God to Abraham, and all his Spiritual-Seed in a peculiar manner, whether they were circumcised or uncircumcised, which believed as Abraham the Father of the Faithful did. And this was signified in God’s accepting such as his People which were not of Abrahams Seed, but bought with his Mony, and this Promise was sealed to Abraham by Circumcision, that through Jesus Christ (whom Isaac typified out) the Gentiles, the Uncircumcision which believed, should have their Faith counted for Righteousness, as Abrahams was before he was circumcised. 2. This Promise consisted of temporal good: so God promised Abrahams Seed should injoy the Land of Canaan, and have plenty of outward blessings, so sealed this Promise by Circumcision. It was also a distinguishing character of the Jews being God’s People from all the Nations of the Gentiles, which as yet were not the Seed of Abraham: but when the Gentiles came to believe, and by Faith became the People of God as well as the Jews, then Circumcision, that distinguishing Mark, ceased; and the character of being the Children of God now, is Faith in Christ, and Circumcision of the Heart. So that whatever pretence there may be for the Infants of Believers to be Baptised first, as their being the Seed of Believers; or 2dly, their being in the Covenant; or 3dly, that the Infant-Seed of Abraham a Believer, was circumcised; all this you see avails nothing: for Circumcision was limited to such a Family, the Family of Abraham, all others, though Believers, were excluded; also limited to such a day, the eighth day, and what ever pretence might be made, it was not to be done before nor after; limited also to such a Sex, the Male, not the Female; which if Baptism came in the room of Circumcision, and is the Seal of the Covenant under the Gospel, as Circumcision was under the Law, none but the Males must be Baptised, because none but the Males were Circumcised; but as under the Law respecting Circumcision, so now under the Gospel respecting Baptism, it depends purely upon the will of the Law-giver, at what season, upon what Persons and terms Baptism is to be administred; unto which Prophet we shall all do well to hearken, Acts 3:22.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563) has no question like it.

Seeing the Infants of Believers are in the Covenant of Grace with their Parents, as some say, why may not they be baptized under the Gospel, as well as Abrahams Infant Seed was circumcised under the Law?

By the Infants of Believers being in the Covenant of Grace, it must either be meant of the Covenant of Grace absolutely considered, and if so, then there is no total and final Apostacy of any Infant seed of Believers from the Covenant, but all must be saved then. Or, 2. They must mean conditionally, on consideration that when they come to years of maturity, they by true Faith, Love, and Holiness of life, taking hold of God’s Covenant of Grace, shall have the Priviledges of it. This being their sence, I then demand what real spiritual priviledg the Infant-Seed of Believers, as such, have more than the Infant Seed of Unbelievers, if they live also to years of maturity, and by true Faith and Love take hold of God’s Covenant? I further demand, whether the Seal of the Covenant do not under those considerations belong as much to the Children of Unbelievers as to the Children of Believers? yea, and more too, under consideration the Infant Seed of the Unbeliever should take hold of God’s Covenant, and the Believers Infant-Seed do not; as often this is seen to the sorrow of many Godly Parents. 3. Suppose all the Infant Seed of Believers absolutely in the Covenant of Grace; yet Believers under the Gospel ought no more to Baptise their Infant-Seed, than Lot to circumcise himself or his Infant-Seed, if he had had Males as well as Females, albeit nearly related to Abraham, yea, a Believer, and in the Covenant of Grace too: forasmuch as Circumcision was limited to Abraham and to his Family. Also by the same rule we may bring Infants to the Lord’s Table, forasmuch as the same qualifications are required to the due performance of Baptism, as there is to the Lord’s Supper. 4. We must know the Covenant made with Abraham had two parts: first, a spiritual, which consisted in God’s promising to be a God to Abraham, and all his Spiritual-Seed in a peculiar manner, whether they were circumcised or uncircumcised, which believed as Abraham the Father of the Faithful did. And this was signified in God’s accepting such as his People which were not of Abrahams Seed, but bought with his Mony, and this Promise was sealed to Abraham by Circumcision, that through Jesus Christ (whom Isaac typified out) the Gentiles, the Uncircumcision which believed, should have their Faith counted for Righteousness, as Abrahams was before he was circumcised. 2. This Promise consisted of temporal good: so God promised Abrahams Seed should injoy the Land of Canaan, and have plenty of outward blessings, so sealed this Promise by Circumcision. It was also a distinguishing character of the Jews being God’s People from all the Nations of the Gentiles, which as yet were not the Seed of Abraham: but when the Gentiles came to believe, and by Faith became the People of God as well as the Jews, then Circumcision, that distinguishing Mark, ceased; and the character of being the Children of God now, is Faith in Christ, and Circumcision of the Heart. So that whatever pretence there may be for the Infants of Believers to be Baptised first, as their being the Seed of Believers; or 2dly, their being in the Covenant; or 3dly, that the Infant-Seed of Abraham a Believer, was circumcised; all this you see avails nothing: for Circumcision was limited to such a Family, the Family of Abraham, all others, though Believers, were excluded; also limited to such a day, the eighth day, and what ever pretence might be made, it was not to be done before nor after; limited also to such a Sex, the Male, not the Female; which if Baptism came in the room of Circumcision, and is the Seal of the Covenant under the Gospel, as Circumcision was under the Law, none but the Males must be Baptised, because none but the Males were Circumcised; but as under the Law respecting Circumcision, so now under the Gospel respecting Baptism, it depends purely upon the will of the Law-giver, at what season, upon what Persons and terms Baptism is to be administred; unto which Prophet we shall all do well to hearken, Acts 3:22.

Seeing the Infants of Believers are in the Covenant of Grace with their Parents, as some say, why may not they be baptized under the Gospel, as well as Abrahams Infant Seed was circumcised under the Law?

By the Infants of Believers being in the Covenant of Grace, it must either be meant of the Covenant of Grace absolutely considered, and if so, then there is no total and final Apostasy of any Infant seed of Believers from the Covenant, but all must be saved then. Or, 2. They must mean conditionally, on consideration that when they come to years of maturity, they by true Faith, Love, and Holiness of life, taking hold of God’s Covenant of Grace, shall have the Privileges of it. This being their sense, I then demand what real spiritual privilege the Infant-Seed of Believers, as such, have more than the Infant Seed of Unbelievers, if they live also to years of maturity, and by true Faith and Love take hold of God’s Covenant? I further demand, whether the Seal of the Covenant do not under those considerations belong as much to the Children of Unbelievers as to the Children of Believers? yea, and more too, under consideration the Infant Seed of the Unbeliever should take hold of God’s Covenant, and the Believers Infant-Seed do not; as often this is seen to the sorrow of many Godly Parents. 3. Suppose all the Infant Seed of Believers absolutely in the Covenant of Grace; yet Believers under the Gospel ought no more to Baptize their Infant-Seed, than Lot to circumcise himself or his Infant-Seed, if he had had Males as well as Females, albeit nearly related to Abraham, yea, a Believer, and in the Covenant of Grace too: forasmuch as Circumcision was limited to Abraham and to his Family. Also by the same rule we may bring Infants to the Lord’s Table, forasmuch as the same qualifications are required to the due performance of Baptism, as there is to the Lord’s Supper. 4. We must know the Covenant made with Abraham had two parts: first, a spiritual, which consisted in God’s promising to be a God to Abraham, and all his Spiritual-Seed in a peculiar manner, whether they were circumcised or uncircumcised, which believed as Abraham the Father of the Faithful did. And this was signified in God’s accepting such as his People which were not of Abrahams Seed, but bought with his Money, and this Promise was sealed to Abraham by Circumcision, that through Jesus Christ (whom Isaac typified out) the Gentiles, the Uncircumcision which believed, should have their Faith counted for Righteousness, as Abrahams was before he was circumcised. 2. This Promise consisted of temporal good: so God promised Abrahams Seed should enjoy the Land of Canaan, and have plenty of outward blessings, so sealed this Promise by Circumcision. It was also a distinguishing character of the Jews being God’s People from all the Nations of the Gentiles, which as yet were not the Seed of Abraham: but when the Gentiles came to believe, and by Faith became the People of God as well as the Jews, then Circumcision, that distinguishing Mark, ceased; and the character of being the Children of God now, is Faith in Christ, and Circumcision of the Heart. So that whatever pretense there may be for the Infants of Believers to be Baptized first, as their being the Seed of Believers; or 2dly, their being in the Covenant; or 3dly, that the Infant-Seed of Abraham a Believer, was circumcised; all this you see avails nothing: for Circumcision was limited to such a Family, the Family of Abraham, all others, though Believers, were excluded; also limited to such a day, the eighth day, and what ever pretense might be made, it was not to be done before nor after; limited also to such a Sex, the Male, not the Female; which if Baptism came in the room of Circumcision, and is the Seal of the Covenant under the Gospel, as Circumcision was under the Law, none but the Males must be Baptized, because none but the Males were Circumcised; but as under the Law respecting Circumcision, so now under the Gospel respecting Baptism, it depends purely upon the will of the Law-giver, at what season, upon what Persons and terms Baptism is to be administered; unto which Prophet we shall all do well to hearken, Acts 3:22.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563) has no question like it.

Seeing the Infants of Believers are in the Covenant of Grace with their Parents, as some say, why may not they be baptized under the Gospel, as well as Abrahams Infant Seed was circumcised under the Law?

By the Infants of Believers being in the Covenant of Grace, it must either be meant of the Covenant of Grace absolutely considered, and if so, then there is no total and final Apostasy of any Infant seed of Believers from the Covenant, but all must be saved then. Or, 2. They must mean conditionally, on consideration that when they come to years of maturity, they by true Faith, Love, and Holiness of life, taking hold of God’s Covenant of Grace, shall have the Privileges of it. This being their sense, I then demand what real spiritual privilege the Infant-Seed of Believers, as such, have more than the Infant Seed of Unbelievers, if they live also to years of maturity, and by true Faith and Love take hold of God’s Covenant? I further demand, whether the Seal of the Covenant do not under those considerations belong as much to the Children of Unbelievers as to the Children of Believers? yea, and more too, under consideration the Infant Seed of the Unbeliever should take hold of God’s Covenant, and the Believers Infant-Seed do not; as often this is seen to the sorrow of many Godly Parents. 3. Suppose all the Infant Seed of Believers absolutely in the Covenant of Grace; yet Believers under the Gospel ought no more to Baptize their Infant-Seed, than Lot to circumcise himself or his Infant-Seed, if he had had Males as well as Females, albeit nearly related to Abraham, yea, a Believer, and in the Covenant of Grace too: forasmuch as Circumcision was limited to Abraham and to his Family. Also by the same rule we may bring Infants to the Lord’s Table, forasmuch as the same qualifications are required to the due performance of Baptism, as there is to the Lord’s Supper. 4. We must know the Covenant made with Abraham had two parts: first, a spiritual, which consisted in God’s promising to be a God to Abraham, and all his Spiritual-Seed in a peculiar manner, whether they were circumcised or uncircumcised, which believed as Abraham the Father of the Faithful did. And this was signified in God’s accepting such as his People which were not of Abrahams Seed, but bought with his Money, and this Promise was sealed to Abraham by Circumcision, that through Jesus Christ (whom Isaac typified out) the Gentiles, the Uncircumcision which believed, should have their Faith counted for Righteousness, as Abrahams was before he was circumcised. 2. This Promise consisted of temporal good: so God promised Abrahams Seed should enjoy the Land of Canaan, and have plenty of outward blessings, so sealed this Promise by Circumcision. It was also a distinguishing character of the Jews being God’s People from all the Nations of the Gentiles, which as yet were not the Seed of Abraham: but when the Gentiles came to believe, and by Faith became the People of God as well as the Jews, then Circumcision, that distinguishing Mark, ceased; and the character of being the Children of God now, is Faith in Christ, and Circumcision of the Heart. So that whatever pretense there may be for the Infants of Believers to be Baptized first, as their being the Seed of Believers; or 2dly, their being in the Covenant; or 3dly, that the Infant-Seed of Abraham a Believer, was circumcised; all this you see avails nothing: for Circumcision was limited to such a Family, the Family of Abraham, all others, though Believers, were excluded; also limited to such a day, the eighth day, and what ever pretense might be made, it was not to be done before nor after; limited also to such a Sex, the Male, not the Female; which if Baptism came in the room of Circumcision, and is the Seal of the Covenant under the Gospel, as Circumcision was under the Law, none but the Males must be Baptized, because none but the Males were Circumcised; but as under the Law respecting Circumcision, so now under the Gospel respecting Baptism, it depends purely upon the will of the Law-giver, at what season, upon what Persons and terms Baptism is to be administered; unto which Prophet we shall all do well to hearken, Acts 3:22.

Question 74, from Question 69

How art thou admonished and assured by holy in Baptism, that thou art Partaker of the one only Sacrifice of Christ?upon the cross is of real advantage to thee?

Thus: That Because Christ appointed this external commanded the outward washing with of Water, adding thereto adjoyning this Promise thereunto, that I am as certainly no less assuredly washed by his Blood and Spirit from all the pollution uncleanness of my Soul, that is, from all my Sins, as than I am washed externally outwardly with Water, by which whereby all the Filthiness of the Body is commonly washed away.useth to be purged.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 69

How art thou admonished and assured by holy baptism, that the one sacrifice of Christ upon the cross is of real advantage to thee?

Thus: That Christ appointed this external washing with water, adding thereto this promise, that I am as certainly washed by his blood and spirit from all the pollution of my soul; that is, from all my sins, as I am washed externally with water, by which the filthiness of the body is commonly washed away.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 74

How art thou admonished and assured in Baptism, that thou art Partaker of the only Sacrifice of Christ?

Because Christ commanded the outward washing of Water, adjoyning this Promise thereunto, that I am no less assuredly washed by his Blood and Spirit from the uncleanness of my Soul, that is, from all my Sins, than I am washed outwardly with Water, whereby all the Filthiness of the Body useth to be purged.

Question 75, from Question 70

What is it to be washed with the Blood and Spirit of Christ?

It is to receive of God the remission Forgiveness of Sins freely, for the sake of Christ’s Blood of Christ which he shed for us by in his Sacrifice upon the Cross; and also to be renewed by the Holy Ghost, and sanctified through his sanctifying of us to be become Members of Christ, that so we may more and more unto dy to Sin, and lead holy live holily and unblameable lives.without blame.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 70

What is it to be washed with the blood and spirit of Christ?

It is to receive of God the remission of sins, freely, for the sake of Christ’s blood, which he shed for us by his sacrifice upon the cross: and also to be renewed by the Holy Ghost, and sanctified to be members of Christ; that so we may more and more die unto sin, and lead holy and unblameable lives.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 75

What is it to be washed with the Blood and Spirit of Christ?

It is to receive of God Forgiveness of Sins freely, for the Blood of Christ which he shed for us in his Sacrifice upon the Cross; and also to be renewed by the Holy Ghost, and through his sanctifying of us to become Members of Christ, that we may more and more dy to Sin, and live holily and without blame.

Question 76, from Question 71

Where has doth Christ promised promise us that he will as certainly wash us by with his Blood and Spirit, as we are washed with the Water of Baptism?

In the Institution of Baptism, which is thus expressed, the words whereof are these, Go, ye therefore, and teach all Nations, baptising them in the Name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost: he that believeth, shall believe, and is be baptised, shall be saved; but he that believeth will not believe, shall be damned. This Promise is also repeated where again when as the Scripture calleth Baptism the washing of regeneration, and the New-birth, and forgiveness of Sins. the washing away washing of the New-birth, and forgiveness of Sins.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 71

Where has Christ promised us that he will as certainly wash us by his blood and spirit, as we are washed with the water of baptism?

In the institution of baptism which is thus expressed, “go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost,” “he that believeth, and is baptized, shall be saved; but he that believeth not, shall be damned.” This promise is also repeated, where the scripture calls baptism “the washing of regeneration, and the washing away of sins.”

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 76

Where doth Christ promise us that he will as certainly wash us with his Blood and Spirit, as we are washed with the Water of Baptism?

In the Institution of Baptism, the words whereof are these, Go, teach all Nations, baptising them in the Name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost: he that shall believe, and be baptised, shall be saved; but he that will not believe, shall be damned. This Promise is repeated again when as the Scripture calleth Baptism the washing of the New-birth, and forgiveness of Sins. the washing of the New-birth, and forgiveness of Sins.

Question 77, from Question 72

Is then the external outward Baptism with of Water the washing away of sin itself?Sins?

It is not; at all: for the Blood of Jesus Christ only, and the Holy Ghost, cleanse alone cleanseth us from all Sin.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 72

Is then the external baptism with water, the washing away of sin itself?

Not at all: for the blood of Jesus Christ only, and the Holy Ghost, cleanse us from all sin.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 77

Is then the outward Baptism of Water the washing away of Sins?

It is not; for the Blood of Christ alone cleanseth us from all Sin.

Question 78, from Question 73

Why then doth the Holy Ghost call Baptism the washing of regeneration,” the New-birth, and “the washing away forgiveness of Sins?

God thus speaketh so not without great cause, to wit, not only thereby to teach us that as the filth of the our Body is purged away by Water, so our Sins also are removed purged by the Blood and Spirit of Jesus Christ, but especially, that much more to assure us by this divine pledge sign he may assure us, Token and Pledg, that we are spiritually cleansed as verily washed from our Sins as really, with the inward washing, as we are externally washed with by the outward and visible Water.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 73

Why then doth the Holy Ghost call baptism “the washing of regeneration,” and “the washing away of sins?”

God speaks thus not without great cause, to wit, not only thereby to teach us, that as the filth of the body is purged away by water, so our sins are removed by the blood and spirit of Jesus Christ; but especially, that by this divine pledge and sign he may assure us, that we are spiritually cleansed from our sins as really, as we are externally washed with water.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 78

Why then doth the Holy Ghost call Baptism the washing of the New-birth, and forgiveness of Sins?

God speaketh so not without great cause, to wit, not only to teach us that as the filth of our Body is purged by Water, so our Sins also are purged by the Blood and Spirit of Christ, but much more to assure us by this divine Token and Pledg, that we are as verily washed from our Sins with the inward washing, as we are washed by the outward and visible Water.

Question 79, only in An Orthodox Catechism (1680)

What Principle of Christ’s Doctrine in the holy Scripture followeth Baptism in order?

Laying on of Hands, as in Hebrews 6:1–2

Heidelberg Catechism (1563) has no question like it.

What Principle of Christ’s Doctrine in the holy Scripture followeth Baptism in order?

Laying on of Hands, as in Hebrews 6:1–2

What Principle of Christ’s Doctrine in the holy Scripture followeth Baptism in order?

Laying on of Hands, as in Hebrews 6:1–2

Heidelberg Catechism (1563) has no question like it.

What Principle of Christ’s Doctrine in the holy Scripture followeth Baptism in order?

Laying on of Hands, as in Hebrews 6:1–2

Question 80, only in An Orthodox Catechism (1680)

What is the form and end of this Ordinance?

Christ’s Ministers laying their hands solemnly upon the Head of the Baptised, with Prayer to Almighty God for an increase of the Graces and Gifts of the Holy Ghost, to inable us to hold fast the Faith which we now visibly own, having entred into the Church by Holy Baptism, and also be helped thereby to maintain a constant War against the World, Flesh, and the Devil.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563) has no question like it.

What is the form and end of this Ordinance?

Christ’s Ministers laying their hands solemnly upon the Head of the Baptised, with Prayer to Almighty God for an increase of the Graces and Gifts of the Holy Ghost, to inable us to hold fast the Faith which we now visibly own, having entred into the Church by Holy Baptism, and also be helped thereby to maintain a constant War against the World, Flesh, and the Devil.

What is the form and end of this Ordinance?

Christ’s Ministers laying their hands solemnly upon the Head of the Baptized, with Prayer to Almighty God for an increase of the Graces and Gifts of the Holy Ghost, to enable us to hold fast the Faith which we now visibly own, having entred into the Church by Holy Baptism, and also be helped thereby to maintain a constant War against the World, Flesh, and the Devil.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563) has no question like it.

What is the form and end of this Ordinance?

Christ’s Ministers laying their hands solemnly upon the Head of the Baptized, with Prayer to Almighty God for an increase of the Graces and Gifts of the Holy Ghost, to enable us to hold fast the Faith which we now visibly own, having entred into the Church by Holy Baptism, and also be helped thereby to maintain a constant War against the World, Flesh, and the Devil.

Question 81, only in An Orthodox Catechism (1680)

Is it the Duty of every Christian to be under this Practice?

It is so: And appeareth plainly, if we do first consider the Practice of the Primitive Saints, we may read in Acts 8:12–19, of Men and Women that were baptized by Philip in Samaria, which when the Church at Jerusalem heard thereof, they sent down St. Peter and St. John (two Apostles) to them, who when they came thither, laid their Hands on them, and they received the Holy Ghost. What, them! some may say? were these they that were baptized which were Men and Women? So likewise in Acts 19:6–7. When Paul came to Ephesus he found certain Disciples there who were baptised, but had not heard whether there was any Holy Ghost, nor I conceive of the Promise of the Holy Ghost mentioned in Acts 1:4 then the Apostle layeth his Hands on them, and they received the Holy Ghost; and it is said the number of them was about twelve; and Reason sheweth us from this place, and Acts 8 where St. Peter and St. John laid hands on Men and Women, that had here bin twelve score, he would have laid his Hands on them all. And whereas ’tis objected, we do not find the three thousand in Acts 2 under this Ordinance, nor many others which were baptised. As to the three thousand ’tis plain enough they had bin taught it, and doubtless so practised this Ordinance, if we consider the Apostle writing to the Jews, in Hebrews 5 telleth them they had need be taught again the first Principles of the Oracles of God, of which Oracles, Laying on of Hands was one. And as for others which were baptised, where mention is not made of their being under this Ordinance, we may also say many hundreds were baptised which we have no mention of. Shall we conclude many of the Apostles were not baptised, because it is not particularly mentioned? so we must conclude the primitive Saints were not short in this point, although it be not always specified; forasmuch as it is called one of God’s Oracles, as we all know the Moral Law was, wch is perpetually binding, and universally obliging; also called a Principle of Christs Doctrine, yea one of the first Principles; and that is not all, but called a foundation Principle, this with the other five must be laid first in that foundation, on which the Superstructure of Christianity must be built. And would it not have bin very unbecoming the Jews when God gave them ten Commandments, for them to have excluded the fourth? is it not also as unbecoming for any to exclude the fourth Principle of Laying on of Hands, a practical Principle of the Doctrine of Christ, and so practised by the Primitive Christians?

Heidelberg Catechism (1563) has no question like it.

Is it the Duty of every Christian to be under this Practice?

It is so: And appeareth plainly, if we do first consider the Practice of the Primitive Saints, we may read in Acts 8:12–19, of Men and Women that were baptized by Philip in Samaria, which when the Church at Jerusalem heard thereof, they sent down St. Peter and St. John (two Apostles) to them, who when they came thither, laid their Hands on them, and they received the Holy Ghost. What, them! some may say? were these they that were baptized which were Men and Women? So likewise in Acts 19:6–7. When Paul came to Ephesus he found certain Disciples there who were baptised, but had not heard whether there was any Holy Ghost, nor I conceive of the Promise of the Holy Ghost mentioned in Acts 1:4 then the Apostle layeth his Hands on them, and they received the Holy Ghost; and it is said the number of them was about twelve; and Reason sheweth us from this place, and Acts 8 where St. Peter and St. John laid hands on Men and Women, that had here bin twelve score, he would have laid his Hands on them all. And whereas ’tis objected, we do not find the three thousand in Acts 2 under this Ordinance, nor many others which were baptised. As to the three thousand ’tis plain enough they had bin taught it, and doubtless so practised this Ordinance, if we consider the Apostle writing to the Jews, in Hebrews 5 telleth them they had need be taught again the first Principles of the Oracles of God, of which Oracles, Laying on of Hands was one. And as for others which were baptised, where mention is not made of their being under this Ordinance, we may also say many hundreds were baptised which we have no mention of. Shall we conclude many of the Apostles were not baptised, because it is not particularly mentioned? so we must conclude the primitive Saints were not short in this point, although it be not always specified; forasmuch as it is called one of God’s Oracles, as we all know the Moral Law was, wch is perpetually binding, and universally obliging; also called a Principle of Christs Doctrine, yea one of the first Principles; and that is not all, but called a foundation Principle, this with the other five must be laid first in that foundation, on which the Superstructure of Christianity must be built. And would it not have bin very unbecoming the Jews when God gave them ten Commandments, for them to have excluded the fourth? is it not also as unbecoming for any to exclude the fourth Principle of Laying on of Hands, a practical Principle of the Doctrine of Christ, and so practised by the Primitive Christians?

Is it the Duty of every Christian to be under this Practice?

It is so: And appears plainly, if we do first consider the Practice of the Primitive Saints, we may read in Acts 8:12–19, of Men and Women that were baptized by Philip in Samaria, which when the Church at Jerusalem heard thereof, they sent down St. Peter and St. John (two Apostles) to them, who when they came thither, laid their Hands on them, and they received the Holy Ghost. What, them! some may say? were these they that were baptized which were Men and Women? So likewise in Acts 19:6–7. When Paul came to Ephesus he found certain Disciples there who were baptized, but had not heard whether there was any Holy Ghost, nor I conceive of the Promise of the Holy Ghost mentioned in Acts 1:4 then the Apostle lays his Hands on them, and they received the Holy Ghost; and it is said the number of them was about twelve; and Reason shows us from this place, and Acts 8 where St. Peter and St. John laid hands on Men and Women, that had here bin twelve score, he would have laid his Hands on them all. And whereas ’tis objected, we do not find the three thousand in Acts 2 under this Ordinance, nor many others which were baptized. As to the three thousand ’tis plain enough they had bin taught it, and doubtless so practised this Ordinance, if we consider the Apostle writing to the Jews, in Hebrews 5 tells them they had need be taught again the first Principles of the Oracles of God, of which Oracles, Laying on of Hands was one. And as for others which were baptized, where mention is not made of their being under this Ordinance, we may also say many hundreds were baptized which we have no mention of. Shall we conclude many of the Apostles were not baptized, because it is not particularly mentioned? so we must conclude the primitive Saints were not short in this point, although it be not always specified; forasmuch as it is called one of God’s Oracles, as we all know the Moral Law was, which is perpetually binding, and universally obliging; also called a Principle of Christs Doctrine, yea one of the first Principles; and that is not all, but called a foundation Principle, this with the other five must be laid first in that foundation, on which the Superstructure of Christianity must be built. And would it not have bin very unbecoming the Jews when God gave them ten Commandments, for them to have excluded the fourth? is it not also as unbecoming for any to exclude the fourth Principle of Laying on of Hands, a practical Principle of the Doctrine of Christ, and so practised by the Primitive Christians?

Heidelberg Catechism (1563) has no question like it.

Is it the Duty of every Christian to be under this Practice?

It is so: And appears plainly, if we do first consider the Practice of the Primitive Saints, we may read in Acts 8:12–19, of Men and Women that were baptized by Philip in Samaria, which when the Church at Jerusalem heard thereof, they sent down St. Peter and St. John (two Apostles) to them, who when they came thither, laid their Hands on them, and they received the Holy Ghost. What, them! some may say? were these they that were baptized which were Men and Women? So likewise in Acts 19:6–7. When Paul came to Ephesus he found certain Disciples there who were baptized, but had not heard whether there was any Holy Ghost, nor I conceive of the Promise of the Holy Ghost mentioned in Acts 1:4 then the Apostle lays his Hands on them, and they received the Holy Ghost; and it is said the number of them was about twelve; and Reason shows us from this place, and Acts 8 where St. Peter and St. John laid hands on Men and Women, that had here bin twelve score, he would have laid his Hands on them all. And whereas ’tis objected, we do not find the three thousand in Acts 2 under this Ordinance, nor many others which were baptized. As to the three thousand ’tis plain enough they had bin taught it, and doubtless so practised this Ordinance, if we consider the Apostle writing to the Jews, in Hebrews 5 tells them they had need be taught again the first Principles of the Oracles of God, of which Oracles, Laying on of Hands was one. And as for others which were baptized, where mention is not made of their being under this Ordinance, we may also say many hundreds were baptized which we have no mention of. Shall we conclude many of the Apostles were not baptized, because it is not particularly mentioned? so we must conclude the primitive Saints were not short in this point, although it be not always specified; forasmuch as it is called one of God’s Oracles, as we all know the Moral Law was, which is perpetually binding, and universally obliging; also called a Principle of Christs Doctrine, yea one of the first Principles; and that is not all, but called a foundation Principle, this with the other five must be laid first in that foundation, on which the Superstructure of Christianity must be built. And would it not have bin very unbecoming the Jews when God gave them ten Commandments, for them to have excluded the fourth? is it not also as unbecoming for any to exclude the fourth Principle of Laying on of Hands, a practical Principle of the Doctrine of Christ, and so practised by the Primitive Christians?

Question 82, only in An Orthodox Catechism (1680)

Did not the extraordinary Gifts of the Spirit follow upon laying on of Hands in the Apostles time?

It did so: But not simply as the end of that Ordinance. For that Ordinance was appointed for the Ordinary Gifts of the Spirit to the Worlds end; though it is true, God honoured and crowned that Ordinance with Signes and Wonders in the primitive time, as he did others of his Appointment: as for instance, Acts 4 the Place was shaken, as the effect of the Churches Prayer; so Preaching was extraordinarily crowned when St. Peter converted three thousand at one Sermon; and in God’s giving the Holy Ghost to the House of Cornelius while Peter was preaching, so that they spake with Tongues, Acts 10. Also God crowned the holy Ordinance of Baptism extraordinarily, when the Spirit came in the likeness of a Dove, and sate upon our Saviour Christ as he came out of the Water, Matthew 3 and a Voice heard from Heaven, saying, This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased. Also the Eunuch’s Baptism was wonderfully confirmed to him in God’s taking away Philip as soon as he came up out of the Water, insomuch that he went away rejoycing. Now, Beloved, as Prayer, Baptisme, Preaching, doth not cease, though it be not so miraculously owned as in the Primitive times; neither doth laying on of Hands cease, from the same Parity of Reason, though it be not so crowned now, as in the Apostles Days. Moreover our Brethren generally do hold, that five of those Principles in Hebrews 6 are the Duty of every individual Member to believe and practise, namely, every Member (say they) ought to repent, believe, be baptized, believe the Resurrection of the dead, and eternal Judgment; and why this of laying on of Hands should be excluded from being the Practice of every Christian, being a practical Ordinance, the bare belief of it not being enough, it being among the universal Principles of Christ’s Doctrine, I never yet did, nor cannot see any good Reason.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563) has no question like it.

Did not the extraordinary Gifts of the Spirit follow upon laying on of Hands in the Apostles time?

It did so: But not simply as the end of that Ordinance. For that Ordinance was appointed for the Ordinary Gifts of the Spirit to the Worlds end; though it is true, God honoured and crowned that Ordinance with Signes and Wonders in the primitive time, as he did others of his Appointment: as for instance, Acts 4 the Place was shaken, as the effect of the Churches Prayer; so Preaching was extraordinarily crowned when St. Peter converted three thousand at one Sermon; and in God’s giving the Holy Ghost to the House of Cornelius while Peter was preaching, so that they spake with Tongues, Acts 10. Also God crowned the holy Ordinance of Baptism extraordinarily, when the Spirit came in the likeness of a Dove, and sate upon our Saviour Christ as he came out of the Water, Matthew 3 and a Voice heard from Heaven, saying, This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased. Also the Eunuch’s Baptism was wonderfully confirmed to him in God’s taking away Philip as soon as he came up out of the Water, insomuch that he went away rejoycing. Now, Beloved, as Prayer, Baptisme, Preaching, doth not cease, though it be not so miraculously owned as in the Primitive times; neither doth laying on of Hands cease, from the same Parity of Reason, though it be not so crowned now, as in the Apostles Days. Moreover our Brethren generally do hold, that five of those Principles in Hebrews 6 are the Duty of every individual Member to believe and practise, namely, every Member (say they) ought to repent, believe, be baptized, believe the Resurrection of the dead, and eternal Judgment; and why this of laying on of Hands should be excluded from being the Practice of every Christian, being a practical Ordinance, the bare belief of it not being enough, it being among the universal Principles of Christ’s Doctrine, I never yet did, nor cannot see any good Reason.

Did not the extraordinary Gifts of the Spirit follow upon laying on of Hands in the Apostles time?

It did so: But not simply as the end of that Ordinance. For that Ordinance was appointed for the Ordinary Gifts of the Spirit to the Worlds end; though it is true, God honored and crowned that Ordinance with Signs and Wonders in the primitive time, as he did others of his Appointment: as for instance, Acts 4 the Place was shaken, as the effect of the Churches Prayer; so Preaching was extraordinarily crowned when St. Peter converted three thousand at one Sermon; and in God’s giving the Holy Ghost to the House of Cornelius while Peter was preaching, so that they spoke with Tongues, Acts 10. Also God crowned the holy Ordinance of Baptism extraordinarily, when the Spirit came in the likeness of a Dove, and sate upon our Savior Christ as he came out of the Water, Matthew 3 and a Voice heard from Heaven, saying, This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased. Also the Eunuch’s Baptism was wonderfully confirmed to him in God’s taking away Philip as soon as he came up out of the Water, insomuch that he went away rejoicing. Now, Beloved, as Prayer, Baptism, Preaching, does not cease, though it be not so miraculously owned as in the Primitive times; neither does laying on of Hands cease, from the same Parity of Reason, though it be not so crowned now, as in the Apostles Days. Moreover our Brethren generally do hold, that five of those Principles in Hebrews 6 are the Duty of every individual Member to believe and practice, namely, every Member (say they) ought to repent, believe, be baptized, believe the Resurrection of the dead, and eternal Judgment; and why this of laying on of Hands should be excluded from being the Practice of every Christian, being a practical Ordinance, the bare belief of it not being enough, it being among the universal Principles of Christ’s Doctrine, I never yet did, nor cannot see any good Reason.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563) has no question like it.

Did not the extraordinary Gifts of the Spirit follow upon laying on of Hands in the Apostles time?

It did so: But not simply as the end of that Ordinance. For that Ordinance was appointed for the Ordinary Gifts of the Spirit to the Worlds end; though it is true, God honored and crowned that Ordinance with Signs and Wonders in the primitive time, as he did others of his Appointment: as for instance, Acts 4 the Place was shaken, as the effect of the Churches Prayer; so Preaching was extraordinarily crowned when St. Peter converted three thousand at one Sermon; and in God’s giving the Holy Ghost to the House of Cornelius while Peter was preaching, so that they spoke with Tongues, Acts 10. Also God crowned the holy Ordinance of Baptism extraordinarily, when the Spirit came in the likeness of a Dove, and sate upon our Savior Christ as he came out of the Water, Matthew 3 and a Voice heard from Heaven, saying, This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased. Also the Eunuch’s Baptism was wonderfully confirmed to him in God’s taking away Philip as soon as he came up out of the Water, insomuch that he went away rejoicing. Now, Beloved, as Prayer, Baptism, Preaching, does not cease, though it be not so miraculously owned as in the Primitive times; neither does laying on of Hands cease, from the same Parity of Reason, though it be not so crowned now, as in the Apostles Days. Moreover our Brethren generally do hold, that five of those Principles in Hebrews 6 are the Duty of every individual Member to believe and practice, namely, every Member (say they) ought to repent, believe, be baptized, believe the Resurrection of the dead, and eternal Judgment; and why this of laying on of Hands should be excluded from being the Practice of every Christian, being a practical Ordinance, the bare belief of it not being enough, it being among the universal Principles of Christ’s Doctrine, I never yet did, nor cannot see any good Reason.

Question 83, from Question 75

How art thou admonished and assured in the Lords Supper admonished and warranted that thou art a Partaker of that one only Sacrifice of Christ accomplished offered on the Cross, and of all his Benefits?

Thus: That Because Christ hath commanded me and all believers, the Faithful to eat of this broken bread, Bread broken, and to drink of this Cup, distributed in Remembrance of him, adding these promises: with this Promise adjoyned, first, that his Body was offered and on the cross as certainly broken and offered for me upon the Cross, and his Blood shed for me, as certainly as I see behold with my Eyes the Bread of the Lord broken for unto me, and the Cup communicated to unto me: and further, that he feeds and nourishes my Soul is no less assuredly fed to everlasting life with his crucified Body, which was crucified for me, and shed as assuredly as his Blood which was shed for me, than I receive from the hands of the minister, and taste with my by the Mouth of my Body, the Bread and cup of Wine, the Lord, as certain Signs of the Body and Blood of Christ.our Lord, received at the Hand of the Minister.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 75

How art thou admonished and assured in the Lord’s supper, that thou art a partaker of that one sacrifice of Christ accomplished on the cross, and of all his benefits?

Thus: That Christ has commanded me and all believers, to eat of this broken bread, and to drink of this cup, in remembrance of him; adding these promises: first, that his body was offered and broken on the cross for me, and his blood shed for me, as certainly as I see with my eyes, the bread of the Lord broken for me, and the cup communicated to me: and further, that he feeds and nourishes my soul to everlasting life, with his crucified body and shed blood, as assuredly as I receive from the hands of the minister, and taste with my mouth the bread and cup of the Lord, as certain signs of the body and blood of Christ.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 83

How art thou in the Lords Supper admonished and warranted that thou art Partaker of that only Sacrifice of Christ offered on the Cross, and of all his Benefits?

Because Christ hath commanded me and all the Faithful to eat of this Bread broken, and to drink of this Cup, distributed in Remembrance of him, with this Promise adjoyned, first, that his Body was as certainly broken and offered for me upon the Cross, and his Blood shed for me, as I behold with my Eyes the Bread of the Lord broken unto me, and the Cup communicated unto me: and further, that my Soul is no less assuredly fed to everlasting life with his Body, which was crucified for me, and his Blood which was shed for me, than I receive and taste by the Mouth of my Body, the Bread and Wine, the Signs of the Body and Blood of our Lord, received at the Hand of the Minister.

Question 84, from Question 76

What is it then to eat the crucified Body and drink the shed blood of Christ?

It is not only to with a believing heart all imbrace, by an assured Confidence of Mind, the sufferings whole Passion and Death of Christ, and thereby, to obtain the pardon Forgiveness of Sins, and everlasting Life, eternal; but also besides that, to become more and more united to his sacred body, by the Holy Ghost, who dwelleth both in Christ, and in us, so more and more to be united to his sacred Body, that we, though Christ is he be in Heaven, and we on Earth, yet nevertheless we are notwithstanding Flesh of his Flesh, and Bone of his Bones: and that we live, and are governed for ever by one spirit, as all the Members of the same Body are quickned by one Soul: so are we also quickned and guided by one and the same Spirit.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 76

What is it then to eat the crucified body, and drink the shed blood of Christ?

It is not only to embrace with a believing heart all the sufferings and death of Christ, and thereby to obtain the pardon of sin, and life eternal; but also, besides that, to become more and more united to his sacred body, by the Holy Ghost, who dwells both in Christ and in us: so that we, though Christ is in heaven and we on earth, are notwithstanding “Flesh of his flesh, and bone of his bone;” and that we live, and are governed for ever by one spirit, as members of the same body are by one soul.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 84

What is it to eat the Body of Christ?

It is not only to imbrace, by an assured Confidence of Mind, the whole Passion and Death of Christ, and thereby, to obtain Forgiveness of Sins, and everlasting Life, but also by the Holy Ghost, who dwelleth both in Christ, and us, so more and more to be united to his sacred Body, that though he be in Heaven, and we on Earth, yet nevertheless we are Flesh of his Flesh, and Bone of his Bones: and as all the Members of the Body are quickned by one Soul: so are we also quickned and guided by one and the same Spirit.

Question 85, from Question 77

Where has hath Christ promised that he will as certainly feed and nourish believers with give his Body and Blood so to be eaten and drunken, as they eat of this Bread broken, bread, and drink of this Cup?

In the Institution of the Supper, which is thus expressed; the Words whereof are these. Our Lord Jesus Christ in the same Night in which that he was betrayed, took Bread, and when he had given thanks, he brake it, and said, Take, eat, this is my Body which is broken for you: this do in Remembrance of me. after the same manner he Likewise also he took the Cup, when he had supped, saying, and said, This Cup, is the new Testament in my Blood; this do ye, as often as ye shall drink it in Remembrance of me: for as often as ye shall eat this Bread, and drink this Cup, ye do shew the Lords Death till he come. This Promise, is repeated by the holy apostle St. Paul where he saith, The Cup of blessing which we bless, is it not the Communion of the Blood of Christ? the Bread which we break, is it not the Communion of the Body of Christ? for we being that are many, are one Bread, and one Body, because we are all Partakers of that one Bread.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 77

Where has Christ promised that he will as certainly feed and nourish believers with his body and blood, as they eat of this broken bread, and drink of this cup?

In the institution of the supper, which is thus expressed; “The Lord Jesus, in the same night in which he was betrayed, took bread, and when he had given thanks, he brake it, and said, eat; this is my body, which is broken for you; this do in remembrance of me: after the same manner he also took the cup, when he had supped, saying, this cup is the new testament in my blood; this do ye, as often as ye drink it, in remembrance of me. For, as often as ye eat this bread, and drink this cup, ye do show the Lord’s death till he come.” This promise is repeated by the holy apostle Paul, where he says, “The cup of blessing which we bless, is it not the communion of the blood of Christ? The bread which we break, is it not the communion of the body of Christ? for we, being many, are one bread and one body, because we are all partakers of that one bread.”

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 85

Where hath Christ promised that he will as certainly give his Body and Blood so to be eaten and drunken, as they eat this Bread broken, and drink this Cup?

In the Institution of the Supper, the Words whereof are these. Our Lord Jesus Christ in the Night that he was betrayed, took Bread, and when he had given thanks, he brake it, and said, Take, eat, this is my Body which is broken for you: this do in Remembrance of me. Likewise also he took the Cup, when he had supped, and said, This Cup, is the new Testament in my Blood; this do as often as ye shall drink it in Remembrance of me: for as often as ye shall eat this Bread, and drink this Cup, ye shew the Lords Death till he come. This Promise, is repeated by St. Paul where he saith, The Cup of blessing which we bless, is it not the Communion of the Blood of Christ? the Bread which we break, is it not the Communion of the Body of Christ? for we that are many, are one Bread, and one Body, because we are all Partakers of one Bread.

Question 86, from Question 78

Do Are then the Bread and Wine become made the very Body and Blood of Christ?

Not at all: No, verily; but as the Water in of Baptism is not changed turned into the Blood of Christ, but is only a Signe and Pledge of those things that are sealed to us in Baptism; so neither is the washing away of sin itself, being only the sign and confirmation thereof appointed of God: so the in Bread of the Lords Supper is not changed into the very Body of Christ, though agreeably although according to the nature and properties manner of Sacraments, it and that Form of speaking of them which is usual unto the Holy Ghost, the Bread is called the Body of Christ.Jesus.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 78

Do then the bread and wine become the very body and blood of Christ?

Not at all: but as the water in baptism is not changed into the blood of Christ, neither is the washing away of sin itself, being only the sign and confirmation thereof appointed of God: so the bread in the Lord’s supper is not changed into the very body of Christ; though agreeably to the nature and properties of sacraments, it is called the body of Christ Jesus.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 86

Are then the Bread and Wine made the very Body and Blood of Christ?

No, verily; but as the Water of Baptism is not turned into the Blood of Christ, but is only a Signe and Pledge of those things that are sealed to us in Baptism; so neither is the Bread of the Lords Supper the very Body of Christ, although according to the manner of Sacraments, and that Form of speaking of them which is usual unto the Holy Ghost, the Bread is called the Body of Christ.

Question 87, from Question 79

Why then doth Christ call the Bread his Body, and the Cup his Blood, or the new covenant Testament in his Blood; and St. Paul calleth Bread and Wine the Communion of the Body and Blood of Christ?

Christ speaks thus, not without great reason, namely, Consideration speaketh so, to wit, not only thereby for to teach us that as the Bread and Wine support this temporal sustain the Life of the Body, so also his crucified Body, and shed Blood shed, are indeed the true Meat and Drink whereby of our Souls, whereby they are fed nourished to eternal Life; but much more especially that by these this visible signs Signe and pledges to Pledg, he may assure us that we are as really verily Partakers of this true his Body and Blood, (by through the operation working of the Holy Ghost, as we receive do perceive by the mouths Mouth of our bodies Body, these holy Signes in Remembrance of him; and further also, that all his Sufferings and Obedience are as is so certainly ours, as if though we had in own persons our selves had suffered and made satisfaction Punishments for our Sins, to and had satisfied God.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 79

Why then doth Christ call the bread his body, and the cup his blood, or the new covenant in his blood; and Paul the “Communion of the body and blood of Christ?”

Christ speaks thus, not without great reason, namely, not only thereby to teach us, that as bread and wine support this temporal life, so his crucified body and shed blood are the true meat and drink, whereby our souls are fed to eternal life; but more especially by these visible signs and pledges to assure us, that we are as really partakers of this true body and blood (by the operation of the Holy Ghost) as we receive by the mouths of our bodies these holy signs in remembrance of him; and that all his sufferings and obedience are as certainly ours, as if we had in our own persons suffered and made satisfaction for our sins to God.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 87

Why then doth Christ call Bread his Body, and the Cup his Blood, or the new Testament in his Blood; and St. Paul calleth Bread and Wine the Communion of the Body and Blood of Christ?

Christ not without great Consideration speaketh so, to wit, not only for to teach us that as the Bread and Wine sustain the Life of the Body, so also his crucified Body, and Blood shed, are indeed the Meat and Drink of our Souls, whereby they are nourished to eternal Life; but much more that by this visible Signe and Pledg, he may assure us that we are as verily Partakers of his Body and Blood, through the working of the Holy Ghost, as we do perceive by the Mouth of our Body, these holy Signes in Remembrance of him; and further also, that his Sufferings and Obedience is so certainly ours, as though we our selves had suffered Punishments for our Sins, and had satisfied God.

Question 88, from Question 80

What Difference is there between the Lord’s Supper of the Lord, and the Popish Mass?

The Lord’s Supper to of the Lord testifieth unto us, that we have a full pardon perfect Forgiveness of all sin, by the our Sins, for that only Sacrifice of Jesus Christ, which he himself has once accomplished fully wrought on the Cross; and, then also that we by the Holy Ghost Faith are ingrafted grafted into Christ, who now according to his Human Nature is now not on earth, but only in Heaven at the Right Hand of God his Father, and will there will be worshipped by of us. But in the Mass teacheth, it is denied that the living quick and the dead have not the pardon Remission of Sins, through for the sufferings only Passion of Christ, unless except Christ is also be daily offered for them by the priests; and their Sacrificers: Further, also it is taught, that Christ is bodily under the Forms of Bread and Wine, and therefore is to be worshipped in them: and so that the very Foundation of the Mass at bottom is nothing else than a but an utter denial of the one that only Sacrifice and sufferings Passion of Jesus Christ Jesus, and an accursed Idolatry.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 80

What difference is there between the Lord’s supper and the Popish mass?

The Lord’s supper testifies to us, that we have a full pardon of all sin, by the only sacrifice of Jesus Christ, which he himself has once accomplished on the cross; and, that we by the Holy Ghost are ingrafted into Christ, who, according to his human nature, is now not on earth, but in heaven, at the right hand of God his Father, and will there be worshipped by us:— but the mass teacheth, that the living and dead have not the pardon of sins through the sufferings of Christ, unless Christ is also daily offered for them by the priests; and further, that Christ is bodily under the form of bread and wine, and therefore is to be worshipped in them; so that the mass at bottom is nothing else than a denial of the one sacrifice and sufferings of Jesus Christ, and an accursed idolatry.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 88

What Difference is there between the Supper of the Lord, and the Popish Mass?

The Supper of the Lord testifieth unto us, that we have perfect Forgiveness of all our Sins, for that only Sacrifice of Christ, which himself once fully wrought on the Cross; then also that we by Faith are grafted into Christ, who now according to his Human Nature is only in Heaven at the Right Hand of his Father, and there will be worshipped of us. But in the Mass it is denied that the quick and the dead have Remission of Sins, for the only Passion of Christ, except Christ also be daily offered for them by their Sacrificers: Further, also it is taught, that Christ is bodily under the Forms of Bread and Wine, and therefore is to be worshipped in them: and so the very Foundation of the Mass is nothing else but an utter denial of that only Sacrifice and Passion of Christ Jesus, and an accursed Idolatry.

Question 89, from Question 81

For whom is Who are to come unto the Table of the Lord’s supper instituted?Lord?

For those They only, who are truly sorrowful for they have offended God by their Sins, and yet trust that these those Sins are forgiven pardoned them for the Christ’s sake; of Christ; and that their remaining what other Infirmities they have, that those are covered by his Passion and Death; and who also earnestly desire to have their faith more and more strengthened, to go forward in Faith and their lives more holy; Integrity of life: but Hypocrites, and such as turn them which do not to God with sincere hearts, truly repent, do eat and drink judgment Damnation to themselves.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 81

For whom is the Lord’s supper instituted?

For those who are truly sorrowful for their sins, and yet trust that these are forgiven them for the sake of Christ; and that their remaining infirmities are covered by his passion and death; and who also earnestly desire to have their faith more and more strengthened, and their lives more holy; but hypocrites, and such as turn not to God with sincere hearts, eat and drink judgment to themselves.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 89

Who are to come unto the Table of the Lord?

They only, who are truly sorrowful they have offended God by their Sins, and yet trust that those Sins are pardoned them for Christ’s sake; and what other Infirmities they have, that those are covered by his Passion and Death; who also desire more and more to go forward in Faith and Integrity of life: but Hypocrites, and them which do not truly repent, do eat and drink Damnation to themselves.

Question 90, from Question 82

Are they also to be admitted to this the Lords Supper who by in Confession and Life declare themselves to be Infidels, profane, and ungodly?

No; For by this, that means the covenant Ordinance of God would be is profaned, and his the Wrath kindled of God is stirred up against the whole congregation; therefore it is Assembly, wherefore the duty of the Christian according to Church by the appointment Commandment of Christ and his Apostles, to exclude such persons, inspired by the Holy Ghost, using the Keys of the Kingdom of Heaven, ought to drive them from this Supper till they show amendment of life.shall repent and change their Manners.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 82

Are they also to be admitted to this supper, who, by confession and life, declare themselves infidels and ungodly?

No; for by this, the covenant of God would be profaned, and his wrath kindled against the whole congregation; therefore it is the duty of the Christian church, according to the appointment of Christ and his apostles, to exclude such persons, by the keys of the kingdom of heaven, till they show amendment of life.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 90

Are they also to be admitted to the Lords Supper who in Confession and Life declare themselves to be Infidels, profane, and ungodly?

No; For by that means the Ordinance of God is profaned, and the Wrath of God is stirred up against the whole Assembly, wherefore the Church by the Commandment of Christ and his Apostles, inspired by the Holy Ghost, using the Keys of the Kingdom of Heaven, ought to drive them from this Supper till they shall repent and change their Manners.

Question 91, only in An Orthodox Catechism (1680)

How ought this Ordinance of the Lords Supper to be closed?

In singing Praises to God vocally and audibly for his great Benefits and Blessings to his Church in the shedding of the most precious Blood of his Son to take away their Sin; which Blessings are pointed out in this Sacrament. Also we find our Lord and his Disciples did close up this Ordinance in singing an Hymn or Psalm; and if Christ did sing, who was going to dy, what cause have we to sing for whom he died, that we might not eternally dy, but live a spiritual and eternal life with Father, Son, and Spirit in unexpressible Glory.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563) has no question like it.

How ought this Ordinance of the Lords Supper to be closed?

In singing Praises to God vocally and audibly for his great Benefits and Blessings to his Church in the shedding of the most precious Blood of his Son to take away their Sin; which Blessings are pointed out in this Sacrament. Also we find our Lord and his Disciples did close up this Ordinance in singing an Hymn or Psalm; and if Christ did sing, who was going to dy, what cause have we to sing for whom he died, that we might not eternally dy, but live a spiritual and eternal life with Father, Son, and Spirit in unexpressible Glory.

How ought this Ordinance of the Lords Supper to be closed?

In singing Praises to God vocally and audibly for his great Benefits and Blessings to his Church in the shedding of the most precious Blood of his Son to take away their Sin; which Blessings are pointed out in this Sacrament. Also we find our Lord and his Disciples did close up this Ordinance in singing an Hymn or Psalm; and if Christ did sing, who was going to die, what cause have we to sing for whom he died, that we might not eternally die, but live a spiritual and eternal life with Father, Son, and Spirit in unexpressible Glory.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563) has no question like it.

How ought this Ordinance of the Lords Supper to be closed?

In singing Praises to God vocally and audibly for his great Benefits and Blessings to his Church in the shedding of the most precious Blood of his Son to take away their Sin; which Blessings are pointed out in this Sacrament. Also we find our Lord and his Disciples did close up this Ordinance in singing an Hymn or Psalm; and if Christ did sing, who was going to die, what cause have we to sing for whom he died, that we might not eternally die, but live a spiritual and eternal life with Father, Son, and Spirit in unexpressible Glory.

Question 92, from Question 83

You told us but now, that those who in Confession and Life declare themselves to be Infidels, profane and ungodly, should by the Keys of the Kingdom of Heaven be driven from this Supper: what are the Keys of the Kingdom of Heaven?

The Preaching of the holy Gospel and Christian Ecclesiastical Discipline, or excommunication out of the Christian church: by these two, the kingdom of which Heaven is opened to the Believers, and is shut against the Unbelievers.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 83

What are the keys of the kingdom of heaven?

The preaching of the holy gospel, and Christian discipline, or excommunication out of the Christian church: by these two, the kingdom of heaven is opened to believers, and shut against unbelievers.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 92

You told us but now, that those who in Confession and Life declare themselves to be Infidels, profane and ungodly, should by the Keys of the Kingdom of Heaven be driven from this Supper: what are the Keys of the Kingdom of Heaven?

Preaching of the Gospel and Ecclesiastical Discipline, by which Heaven is opened to the Believers, and is shut against the Unbelievers.

Question 93, from Question 84

How is the Kingdom of Heaven opened and shut by the preaching of the holy Gospel?

Thus: When according to by the command Commandment of Christ it is declared and testified publickly declared to all and every believer, that, whenever they receive the promise one of the Faithful, that all their Sins are pardoned them of God for the Merit of Christ, so often as they imbrace by a lively Faith the gospel by a true faith, really forgiven Promise of the sake Christ’s merits; and on contrary, when it Gospel: but contrarily is declared and testified denounced to all unbelievers, Infidels and such as do not sincerely repent, Hypocrites, that they stand exposed to so long the Wrath of God and eternal condemnation, so long doth ly on them, as they are unconverted:— persist in their Wickedness, according to which Testimony of the Gospel God will judge them, both as well in this and life as in the life to come.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 84

How is the kingdom of heaven opened and shut by the preaching of the holy gospel?

Thus: when according to the command of Christ, it is declared and publicly testified to all and every believer, that, whenever they receive the promise of the gospel by a true faith, all their sins are really forgiven them of God, for the sake of Christ’s merits; and on the contrary, when it is declared and testified to all unbelievers, and such as do not sincerely repent, that they stand exposed to the wrath of God, and eternal condemnation, so long as they are unconverted:— according to which testimony of the gospel, God will judge them, both in this, and the life to come.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 93

How is the Kingdom of Heaven opened and shut by preaching of the Gospel?

When by the Commandment of Christ it is publickly declared to all and every one of the Faithful, that all their Sins are pardoned them of God for the Merit of Christ, so often as they imbrace by a lively Faith the Promise of the Gospel: but contrarily is denounced to all Infidels and Hypocrites, that so long the Wrath of God doth ly on them, as they persist in their Wickedness, according to which Testimony of the Gospel God will judge them, as well in this life as in the life to come.

Question 94, from Question 85

How is the Kingdom of Heaven opened and shut and opened by Christian Ecclesiastical Discipline?

Thus: When according to the command Commandments of Christ, those, they who under the in Name of are Christians, maintain doctrines, or practices inconsistent therewith, but in their Doctrine and life shew themselves Aliens from Christ, after they have been some time admonished, will not after having been often brotherly admonished, renounce depart from their errors and wicked course of life, are complained of to the church, to those, who Error, Heresies, or Wickedness, are thereunto appointed by made known unto the Church; and if neither then they despise their obey the Churches Admonition, are by them forbid the use of the sacraments; whereby they are excluded same Church kept from the Christian Sacrament, and shut out by Authority received from Christ, from the Congregation or Church, and by God himself from out of the Kingdom of Christ; Heaven. And when again, if they promise profess and show real declare an amendment of life, nothing to the contrary being to be proved upon strict scrutiny and search, are again to be received in Love & Tenderness as Members of Christ and his Church.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 85

How is the kingdom of heaven shut and opened by Christian discipline?

Thus: when according to the command of Christ, those, who under the name of Christians, maintain doctrines, or practices inconsistent therewith, and will not, after having been often brotherly admonished, renounce their errors and wicked course of life, are complained of to the church, or to those, who are thereunto appointed by the church: and if they despise their admonition, are by them forbid the use of the sacraments; whereby they are excluded from the Christian church, and by God himself from the kingdom of Christ; and when they promise and show real amendment, are again received as members of Christ and his church.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 94

How is the Kingdom of Heaven opened and shut by Ecclesiastical Discipline?

When according to the Commandments of Christ, they who in Name are Christians, but in their Doctrine and life shew themselves Aliens from Christ, after they have been some time admonished, will not depart from their Error, Heresies, or Wickedness, are made known unto the Church; and if neither then they obey the Churches Admonition, are by the same Church kept from the Sacrament, and shut out by Authority received from Christ, from the Congregation or Church, and by God himself out of the Kingdom of Heaven. And again, if they profess and declare an amendment of life, nothing to the contrary being to be proved upon strict scrutiny and search, are again to be received in Love & Tenderness as Members of Christ and his Church.

Question 95, from Question 86

Since then Whereas we are delivered from all our misery, merely of grace, through Christ, Sins and Miseries without any Merit of ours, why must by the Mercy of God, only for Christ’s sake; for what cause are we still to do good Works?

Because, after that Christ having hath redeemed and delivered us by also with his Blood, he reneweth us also by his holy Spirit after his own image; that so we may testify by whole to the Image of himself, that we receiving so great Benefits, should shew our conduct, selves all our gratitude life time thankfull to God, for his blessings, and that he may be praised by us; also, honour him; secondly that every one may of us be assured in himself of his Faith by the fruits thereof; his Fruit; and lastly, that by our godly good Conversation others be gained we may win others to Christ.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 86

Since then we are delivered from our misery, merely of grace, through Christ, without any merit of ours, why must we still do good works?

Because Christ, having redeemed and delivered us by his blood, also renews us by his holy spirit, after his own image; that so we may testify by the whole of our conduct, our gratitude to God for his blessings, and that he may be praised by us; also, that every one may be assured in himself of his faith, by the fruits thereof; and that, by our godly conversation, others may be gained to Christ.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 95

Whereas we are delivered from all our Sins and Miseries without any Merit of ours, by the Mercy of God, only for Christ’s sake; for what cause are we to do good Works?

Because, after that Christ hath redeemed us with his Blood, he reneweth us also by his Spirit to the Image of himself, that we receiving so great Benefits, should shew our selves all our life time thankfull to God, and honour him; secondly that every one of us be assured of his Faith by his Fruit; and lastly, that by our good Conversation we may win others to Christ.

Question 96, from Question 87

Cannot they then be saved who, continuing which be unthankful, and remain still careless in their wicked Sins, and ungrateful lives, are not converted from their Wickedness to God?

By no means; for as the holy Scripture declares that no person, idolater, adulterer, thief, beareth Witness, neither unchast Persons, nor Idolaters, nor Adulterers, nor Thievs, nor Covetous man, drunkard, slanderer, robber, or any such like, nor Drunkards, nor Slanderers, nor Robbers, shall inherit enter in to the Kingdom of God.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 87

Cannot they then be saved, who, continuing in their wicked and ungrateful lives, are not converted to God?

By no means: for the holy scripture declares that no unchaste person, idolater, adulterer, thief, covetous man, drunkard, slanderer, robber, or any such like, shall inherit the kingdom of God.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 96

Cannot they then be saved which be unthankful, and remain still careless in their Sins, and are not converted from their Wickedness to God?

By no means; for as the Scripture beareth Witness, neither unchast Persons, nor Idolaters, nor Adulterers, nor Thievs, nor Covetous nor Drunkards, nor Slanderers, nor Robbers, shall enter in to the Kingdom of God.

Question 97, from Question 88

Of how many what Parts doth consisteth the true Conversion of Man consist?unto God?

Of two parts; It consisteth of the mortification mortifying of the old Man, and of the a quickning of the new Man.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 88

Of how many parts doth the true conversion of man consist?

Of two parts; of the mortification of the old, and of the quickening of the new man.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 97

Of what Parts consisteth the Conversion of Man unto God?

It consisteth of the mortifying of the old Man, and a quickning of the new Man.

Question 98, from Question 89

What is the mortification mortifying of the old Man?

It is a sincere sorrow of heart, To be truly and heartily sorry that we provoked thou hast offended God by our thy Sins, and daily more and more to hate and flee from eschew them.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 89

What is the mortification of the old man?

It is a sincere sorrow of heart, that we have provoked God by our sins, and more and more to hate and flee from them.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 98

What is the mortifying of the old Man?

To be truly and heartily sorry that thou hast offended God by thy Sins, and daily more and more hate and eschew them.

Question 99, from Question 90

What is the quickening quickning of the new Man?

It is a sincere True Joy of heart in God through Christ, and with love and delight an earnest Desire to live order thy Life according to the God’s Will of God in and to do all good Works.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 90

What is the quickening of the new man?

It is a sincere joy of heart in God, through Christ, and with love and delight to live according to the will of God in all good works.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 99

What is the quickning of the new Man?

True Joy in God through Christ, and an earnest Desire to order thy Life according to God’s Will and to do all good Works.

Question 100, from Question 91

But What are good Works?

Only Those only which proceed from are done by a true Faith, are performed according to the God’s Law, of God, and are referred only to his Glory, and not such as those which are imagined by us as seeming to us to be right and good, or which are founded on our imaginations, the institutions of delivered and commanded by Men.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 91

But what are good works?

Only those which proceed from a true faith, are performed according to the law of God, and to his glory; and not such as are founded on our imaginations, or the institutions of men.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 100

What are good Works?

Those only which are done by a true Faith, according to God’s Law, and are referred only to his Glory, and not those which are imagined by us as seeming to us to be right and good, or which are delivered and commanded by Men.

Question 101, from Question 92

What Which is the Law of God?

God spake all these words, Exod. xx. Deut. v. saying, The hath I. Com. II. not unto thyself any that Decalogue, or thyself serve visiting iniquity showing unto that ten Commandments.III. IV. to keep it holy: thy work; thy wherefore the Lord blessed the sabbath day, V. thy upon VI. not kill. VII. VIII. IX. X. thou shalt not covet thy neighbour’s man-servant, maid-servant, thy neighbour’s.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 92

What is the law of God?

God spake all these words, Exod. xx. Deut. v. saying, I am the Lord thy God, which hath brought thee out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage. I. Com. Thou shalt have no other gods before me. II. Thou shalt not make unto thyself any graven image, nor the likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or in the earth beneath, or in the water under the earth. Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them; for I, the Lord thy God, am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children, unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me, and showing mercy unto thousands of them that love me and keep my commandments. III. Thou shalt not take the name of the Lord thy God in vain: for the Lord will not hold him guiltless, that taketh his name in vain. IV. Remember the sabbath day, to keep it holy: six days shalt thou labour and do all thy work; but the seventh day is the sabbath of the Lord thy God: in it thou shalt do no manner of work, thou, nor thy son, nor thy daughter, thy man-servant, nor thy maid-servant, nor thy cattle, nor thy stranger that is within thy gates. For in six days the Lord made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them is, and rested the seventh day: wherefore the Lord blessed the sabbath day, and hallowed it. V. Honour thy father and thy mother, that thy days may be long upon the land, which the Lord thy God giveth thee. VI. Thou shalt not kill. VII. Thou shalt not commit adultery. VIII. Thou shalt not steal. IX. Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbour. X. Thou shalt not covet thy neighbour’s house; thou shalt not covet thy neighbour’s wife, nor his man-servant, nor his maid-servant, nor his ox, nor his ass, nor any thing that is thy neighbour’s.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 101

Which is the Law of God?

The Decalogue, or ten Commandments.

Question 102, from Question 93

How are these ten commands Commandments divided?

Into two Tables, whereof the first of which teaches us, former delivereth in four Commandments, how we must ought to behave our selves towards God: the second, latter delivereth in six Commandments, what duties we owe to unto our Neighbours.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 93

How are these ten commands divided?

Into two tables: the first of which teaches us, how we must behave towards God; the second, what duties we owe to our neighbour.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 102

How are these Commandments divided?

Into two Tables, whereof the former delivereth in four Commandments, how we ought to behave our selves towards God: the latter delivereth in six Commandments, what duties we owe unto our Neighbours.

Question 103, from Question 92

What is the law of God?Preface to the ten Commandments?

God spake all these words, Exod. xx. Deut. v. saying, I am JEHOVAH, the Lord thy God, which hath brought thee out of the Land of Egypt, out of the House of Bondage.I. Com. II. not unto thyself any that thyself serve visiting iniquity showing unto that III. IV. to keep it holy: thy work; thy wherefore the Lord blessed the sabbath day, V. thy upon VI. not kill. VII. VIII. IX. X. thou shalt not covet thy neighbour’s man-servant, maid-servant, thy neighbour’s.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 92

What is the law of God?

God spake all these words, Exod. xx. Deut. v. saying, I am the Lord thy God, which hath brought thee out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage. I. Com. Thou shalt have no other gods before me. II. Thou shalt not make unto thyself any graven image, nor the likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or in the earth beneath, or in the water under the earth. Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them; for I, the Lord thy God, am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children, unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me, and showing mercy unto thousands of them that love me and keep my commandments. III. Thou shalt not take the name of the Lord thy God in vain: for the Lord will not hold him guiltless, that taketh his name in vain. IV. Remember the sabbath day, to keep it holy: six days shalt thou labour and do all thy work; but the seventh day is the sabbath of the Lord thy God: in it thou shalt do no manner of work, thou, nor thy son, nor thy daughter, thy man-servant, nor thy maid-servant, nor thy cattle, nor thy stranger that is within thy gates. For in six days the Lord made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them is, and rested the seventh day: wherefore the Lord blessed the sabbath day, and hallowed it. V. Honour thy father and thy mother, that thy days may be long upon the land, which the Lord thy God giveth thee. VI. Thou shalt not kill. VII. Thou shalt not commit adultery. VIII. Thou shalt not steal. IX. Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbour. X. Thou shalt not covet thy neighbour’s house; thou shalt not covet thy neighbour’s wife, nor his man-servant, nor his maid-servant, nor his ox, nor his ass, nor any thing that is thy neighbour’s.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 103

What is the Preface to the ten Commandments?

I am JEHOVAH, the Lord thy God, which brought thee out of the Land of Egypt, out of the House of Bondage.

Question 104, only in An Orthodox Catechism (1680)

What learn we from this Preface?

Three things: first he sheweth to whom the right of all Rule belongs, that is, to God himself. for I am (saith he) JEHOVAH. Secondly, he saith, he is the God of his People, that through the Promise of his Bountifulness he might allure them to obey him. Thirdly, he saith, which brought thee out of the Land of Egypt; as if he should say, I am he who have manifested my self unto thee and bestowed all those Blessings upon thee, therefore thou art bound to shew Thankfulness and Obedience unto me.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563) has no question like it.

What learn we from this Preface?

Three things: first he sheweth to whom the right of all Rule belongs, that is, to God himself. for I am (saith he) JEHOVAH. Secondly, he saith, he is the God of his People, that through the Promise of his Bountifulness he might allure them to obey him. Thirdly, he saith, which brought thee out of the Land of Egypt; as if he should say, I am he who have manifested my self unto thee and bestowed all those Blessings upon thee, therefore thou art bound to shew Thankfulness and Obedience unto me.

What learn we from this Preface?

Three things: first he shows to whom the right of all Rule belongs, that is, to God himself. for I am (says he) JEHOVAH. Secondly, he says, he is the God of his People, that through the Promise of his Bountifulness he might allure them to obey him. Thirdly, he says, which brought you out of the Land of Egypt; as if he should say, I am he who have manifested my self unto you and bestowed all those Blessings upon you, therefore you are bound to show Thankfulness and Obedience unto me.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563) has no question like it.

What learn we from this Preface?

Three things: first he shows to whom the right of all Rule belongs, that is, to God himself. for I am (says he) JEHOVAH. Secondly, he says, he is the God of his People, that through the Promise of his Bountifulness he might allure them to obey him. Thirdly, he says, which brought you out of the Land of Egypt; as if he should say, I am he who have manifested my self unto you and bestowed all those Blessings upon you, therefore you are bound to show Thankfulness and Obedience unto me.

Question 105, only in An Orthodox Catechism (1680)

Do these things belong unto us?

They do so, because they do figuratively comprehend and imply all the Deliverances of the Church; and further, also this was a Type of our wonderful Deliverance atcheived by Christ.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563) has no question like it.

Do these things belong unto us?

They do so, because they do figuratively comprehend and imply all the Deliverances of the Church; and further, also this was a Type of our wonderful Deliverance atcheived by Christ.

Do these things belong unto us?

They do so, because they do figuratively comprehend and imply all the Deliverances of the Church; and further, also this was a Type of our wonderful Deliverance achieved by Christ.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563) has no question like it.

Do these things belong unto us?

They do so, because they do figuratively comprehend and imply all the Deliverances of the Church; and further, also this was a Type of our wonderful Deliverance achieved by Christ.

Question 106, from Question 92

What is the law of God?first Commandment?

God spake all these words, Exod. xx. Deut. v. saying, hath I. Com. Thou shalt have no other Gods before me.II. not unto thyself any that thyself serve visiting iniquity showing unto that III. IV. to keep it holy: thy work; thy wherefore the Lord blessed the sabbath day, V. thy upon VI. not kill. VII. VIII. IX. X. thou shalt not covet thy neighbour’s man-servant, maid-servant, thy neighbour’s.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 92

What is the law of God?

God spake all these words, Exod. xx. Deut. v. saying, I am the Lord thy God, which hath brought thee out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage. I. Com. Thou shalt have no other gods before me. II. Thou shalt not make unto thyself any graven image, nor the likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or in the earth beneath, or in the water under the earth. Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them; for I, the Lord thy God, am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children, unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me, and showing mercy unto thousands of them that love me and keep my commandments. III. Thou shalt not take the name of the Lord thy God in vain: for the Lord will not hold him guiltless, that taketh his name in vain. IV. Remember the sabbath day, to keep it holy: six days shalt thou labour and do all thy work; but the seventh day is the sabbath of the Lord thy God: in it thou shalt do no manner of work, thou, nor thy son, nor thy daughter, thy man-servant, nor thy maid-servant, nor thy cattle, nor thy stranger that is within thy gates. For in six days the Lord made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them is, and rested the seventh day: wherefore the Lord blessed the sabbath day, and hallowed it. V. Honour thy father and thy mother, that thy days may be long upon the land, which the Lord thy God giveth thee. VI. Thou shalt not kill. VII. Thou shalt not commit adultery. VIII. Thou shalt not steal. IX. Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbour. X. Thou shalt not covet thy neighbour’s house; thou shalt not covet thy neighbour’s wife, nor his man-servant, nor his maid-servant, nor his ox, nor his ass, nor any thing that is thy neighbour’s.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 106

What is the first Commandment?

Thou shalt have no other Gods before me.

Question 107, from Question 94

What doth God enjoin require in the first command?Commandment?

That I, as sincerely dearly as I desire tender the Salvation of my own Soul, avoid so earnestly should I shun and flee from sly all Idolatry, Sorcery, sooth-saying, Inchantments, Superstition, invocation of praying to Saints, or any other Creatures, and learn should rightly to know acknowledg the only and true God, trust in him alone, with submit and subject my self unto him with all Humility, and Patience, submit to him; expect look for all good things from him only; love, fear, alone, and lastly with the intire Affection of my Heart love, reverence, and glorify him whole worship him, so that I am ready to renounce and forsake all Creatures rather than to commit even the least thing contrary to that may be against his Will.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 94

What doth God enjoin in the first command?

That I, as sincerely as I desire the salvation of my own soul, avoid and flee from all idolatry, sorcery, sooth-saying, superstition, invocation of saints, or any other creatures: and learn rightly to know the only true God; trust in him alone, with humility and patience submit to him; expect all good things from him only; love, fear, and glorify him with my whole heart: so that I renounce and forsake all creatures, rather than commit even the least thing contrary to his will.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 107

What doth God require in the first Commandment?

That as dearly as I tender the Salvation of my own Soul, so earnestly should I shun and sly all Idolatry, Sorcery, Inchantments, Superstition, praying to Saints, or any other Creatures, and should rightly acknowledg the only and true God, trust in him alone, submit and subject my self unto him with all Humility, and Patience, look for all good things from him alone, and lastly with the intire Affection of my Heart love, reverence, and worship him, so that I am ready to renounce and forsake all Creatures rather than to commit the least thing that may be against his Will.

Question 108, from Question 95

What is Idolatry?

Idolatry It is instead in Place of that one God, or besides that one true God who hath manifested himself in his Word and Works, to contrive, make or have imagin, and account any other object, in which men place their trust.thing wherein thou reposest thy Hope and Confidence.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 95

What is idolatry?

Idolatry is, instead of, or besides that one true God, who has manifested himself in his word, to contrive, or have any other object, in which men place their trust.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 108

What is Idolatry?

It is in Place of that one God, or besides that one true God who hath manifested himself in his Word and Works, to make or imagin, and account any other thing wherein thou reposest thy Hope and Confidence.

Question 109, from Question 92

What is the law of God?second Commandment?

God spake all these words, Exod. xx. Deut. v. saying, hath I. Com. Thou shalt make to thee no II. not unto thyself any graven Image, nor the Likeness of any thing that which is in Heaven above, or in the Earth beneath, nor in the Waters under the Earth: thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve worship them, for I the Lord thy God am a jealous God, visiting and visit the iniquity sins of the Fathers upon the Children, unto the third and fourth Generation of them that hate me, and showing shew Mercy unto to thousands of them that which love me, and keep my Commandments.III. IV. to keep it holy: thy work; thy wherefore the Lord blessed the sabbath day, V. thy upon VI. not kill. VII. VIII. IX. X. thou shalt not covet thy neighbour’s man-servant, maid-servant, thy neighbour’s.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 92

What is the law of God?

God spake all these words, Exod. xx. Deut. v. saying, I am the Lord thy God, which hath brought thee out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage. I. Com. Thou shalt have no other gods before me. II. Thou shalt not make unto thyself any graven image, nor the likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or in the earth beneath, or in the water under the earth. Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them; for I, the Lord thy God, am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children, unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me, and showing mercy unto thousands of them that love me and keep my commandments. III. Thou shalt not take the name of the Lord thy God in vain: for the Lord will not hold him guiltless, that taketh his name in vain. IV. Remember the sabbath day, to keep it holy: six days shalt thou labour and do all thy work; but the seventh day is the sabbath of the Lord thy God: in it thou shalt do no manner of work, thou, nor thy son, nor thy daughter, thy man-servant, nor thy maid-servant, nor thy cattle, nor thy stranger that is within thy gates. For in six days the Lord made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them is, and rested the seventh day: wherefore the Lord blessed the sabbath day, and hallowed it. V. Honour thy father and thy mother, that thy days may be long upon the land, which the Lord thy God giveth thee. VI. Thou shalt not kill. VII. Thou shalt not commit adultery. VIII. Thou shalt not steal. IX. Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbour. X. Thou shalt not covet thy neighbour’s house; thou shalt not covet thy neighbour’s wife, nor his man-servant, nor his maid-servant, nor his ox, nor his ass, nor any thing that is thy neighbour’s.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 109

What is the second Commandment?

Thou shalt make to thee no graven Image, nor the Likeness of any thing which is in Heaven above, or in the Earth beneath, nor in the Waters under the Earth: thou shalt not bow down to them, nor worship them, for I the Lord thy God am a jealous God, and visit the sins of the Fathers upon the Children, unto the third and fourth Generation of them that hate me, and shew Mercy to thousands of them which love me, and keep my Commandments.

Question 110, from Question 96

What doth God this second Commandment require?in the second command?

That we in no wise should not express or represent God by images, nor any Image or shape and figure, or worship him in any other way than otherwise then he hath commanded himself in his Word to be worshipped.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 96

What doth God require in the second command?

That we in no wise represent God by images, nor worship him in any other way than he has commanded in his word.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 110

What doth this second Commandment require?

That we should not express or represent God by any Image or shape and figure, or worship him any otherwise then he hath commanded himself in his Word to be worshipped.

Question 111, from Question 97

Are images May there then not at all to any Images or Resemblances of things be made?

God neither can, may ought, nor can be represented by any means: but as to though they may represented, and for the Creatures, although it be lawful to express them, yet God forbiddeth notwithstanding their Images to make, be made or have any resemblance of them, either in order had, as thereby to worship or honour either them, or to serve God by them:

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 97

Are images then not at all to be made?

God neither can, nor may be represented by any means, but as to creatures, though they may be represented, yet God forbids to make, or have any resemblance of them, either in order to worship them, or to serve God by them.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 111

May there then at all any Images or Resemblances of things be made?

God neither ought, nor can be represented by any means: and for the Creatures, although it be lawful to express them, yet God forbiddeth notwithstanding their Images to be made or had, as thereby to worship or honour either them, or God by them:

Question 112, from Question 98

But may not Images be tolerated in the Churches, as which may serve for Books of unto the laity?common People?

No, for we must pretend to ’tis not seemly that we should be wiser than then God, who will have his people Church to be taught not by dumb images, but by the lively preaching of his Word, and not with dumb Images.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 98

But may not images be tolerated in the churches, as books of the laity?

No: for we must not pretend to be wiser than God who will have his people taught, not by dumb images, but by the lively preaching of his word.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 112

But may not Images be tolerated in Churches, which may serve for Books unto the common People?

No, for ’tis not seemly that we should be wiser then God, who will have his Church to be taught by the lively preaching of his Word, and not with dumb Images.

Question 113, from Question 92

What is the law of God?third Commandment?

God spake all these words, Exod. xx. Deut. v. saying, hath I. Com. Thou shalt II. not unto thyself any that not thyself serve visiting iniquity showing unto that III. take the Name of the Lord thy God in vain; for the Lord will not hold him guiltless that taketh his Name in vain.IV. to keep it holy: thy work; thy wherefore the Lord blessed the sabbath day, V. thy upon VI. not kill. VII. VIII. IX. X. thou shalt not covet thy neighbour’s man-servant, maid-servant, thy neighbour’s.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 92

What is the law of God?

God spake all these words, Exod. xx. Deut. v. saying, I am the Lord thy God, which hath brought thee out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage. I. Com. Thou shalt have no other gods before me. II. Thou shalt not make unto thyself any graven image, nor the likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or in the earth beneath, or in the water under the earth. Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them; for I, the Lord thy God, am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children, unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me, and showing mercy unto thousands of them that love me and keep my commandments. III. Thou shalt not take the name of the Lord thy God in vain: for the Lord will not hold him guiltless, that taketh his name in vain. IV. Remember the sabbath day, to keep it holy: six days shalt thou labour and do all thy work; but the seventh day is the sabbath of the Lord thy God: in it thou shalt do no manner of work, thou, nor thy son, nor thy daughter, thy man-servant, nor thy maid-servant, nor thy cattle, nor thy stranger that is within thy gates. For in six days the Lord made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them is, and rested the seventh day: wherefore the Lord blessed the sabbath day, and hallowed it. V. Honour thy father and thy mother, that thy days may be long upon the land, which the Lord thy God giveth thee. VI. Thou shalt not kill. VII. Thou shalt not commit adultery. VIII. Thou shalt not steal. IX. Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbour. X. Thou shalt not covet thy neighbour’s house; thou shalt not covet thy neighbour’s wife, nor his man-servant, nor his maid-servant, nor his ox, nor his ass, nor any thing that is thy neighbour’s.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 113

What is the third Commandment?

Thou shalt not take the Name of the Lord thy God in vain; for the Lord will not hold him guiltless that taketh his Name in vain.

Question 114, from Question 99

What is required doth God decree in the third command?Commandment?

That we, not only by cursing or perjury, forswearing, but also by rash swearing must we should not profane or abuse the of God, nor use his Name despitefully, or unreverently, neither should by silence nor connivance be Partakers of these horrible Sins in others, and, briefly, but that we use the sacred and holy Name of God no otherwise than ever with fear great Devotion and Reverence, so that he may be rightly confessed and worshipped and honoured by us with a true and be glorified stedfast Confession and Invocation of his Name; and lastly, in all our Words and works.Actions whatsoever.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 99

What is required in the third command?

That we, not only by cursing or perjury, but also by rash swearing, must not profane or abuse the name of God, nor by silence or connivance be partakers of these horrible sins in others: and, briefly, that we use the holy name of God no otherwise than with fear and reverence; so that he may be rightly confessed and worshipped by us, and be glorified in all our words and works.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 114

What doth God decree in the third Commandment?

That not only by cursing or forswearing, but also by rash swearing we should not use his Name despitefully, or unreverently, neither should by silence nor connivance be Partakers of these horrible Sins in others, but that we use the sacred and holy Name of God ever with great Devotion and Reverence, that he may be worshipped and honoured by us with a true and stedfast Confession and Invocation of his Name; and lastly, in all our Words and Actions whatsoever.

Question 115, from Question 100

Is it then the profaning of God’s name, by swearing and cursing, so heinous grievous a Sin by swearing, or banning, to take the Name of God in vain, as that his wrath God is kindled against those also angry with them who do not endeavour, in as much as in them lies, to prevent and lieth do not forbid such cursing and swearing?or hinder it?

It undoubtedly is: there Surely most grievous: for neither is no there any Sin greater, or more provoking to offending God, than the profaning despiting of his sacred Name; and therefore wherefore also he has commanded would have this Sin to be punished with Death.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 100

Is then the profaning of God’s name, by swearing and cursing, so heinous a sin, that his wrath is kindled against those who do not endeavour, as much as in them lies, to prevent and forbid such cursing and swearing?

It undoubtedly is: for there is no sin greater, or more provoking to God, than the profaning of his name; and therefore he has commanded this sin to be punished with death.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 115

Is it then so grievous a Sin by swearing, or banning, to take the Name of God in vain, as that God is also angry with them who in as much as in them lieth do not forbid or hinder it?

Surely most grievous: for neither is there any Sin greater, or more offending God, than the despiting of his sacred Name; wherefore also he would have this Sin to be punished with Death.

Question 116, from Question 101

May we then a Man swear religiously and lawfully, by the Name of God?

Yes: either He may when as either the magistrates demand lawful Magistrate exacteth it, of the subjects; or when otherwise necessity us thereby to confirm fidelity requireth it: by this means the Faith and Truth of any Man, or thing to be ratified and established, whereby both the Glory of God may be advanced, and the safety of our neighbour: others procured: for such an oath this kind of Swearing is founded on ordained by God’s Word, and therefore was justly well used by of the saints, Fathers both in the old and new Testament.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 101

May we then swear religiously by the name of God?

Yes: either when the magistrates demand it of the subjects; or when necessity requires us thereby to confirm fidelity and truth to the glory of God, and the safety of our neighbour: for such an oath is founded on God’s word, and therefore was justly used by the saints, both in the Old and New Testament.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 116

May a Man swear religiously and lawfully, by the Name of God?

He may when as either the lawful Magistrate exacteth it, or otherwise necessity requireth it: by this means the Faith and Truth of any Man, or thing to be ratified and established, whereby both the Glory of God may be advanced, and the safety of others procured: for this kind of Swearing is ordained by God’s Word, and therefore was well used of the Fathers both in the old and new Testament.

Question 117, from Question 102

May we also Is it lawful to swear by Saints, or any other Creatures?

No, for a lawful Oath is calling upon an Invocation of God, whereby we desire that he, as the only one who knows the heart; that he will searcher of Hearts, bear Witness to unto the Truth, and will punish me the Swearer if I he wittingly swear falsely: which but this Honour is due agreeth to no Creature.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 102

May we also swear by saints or any other creatures?

No: for a lawful oath is calling upon God, as the only one who knows the heart; that he will bear witness to the truth, and punish me if I swear falsely; which honour is due to no creature.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 117

Is it lawful to swear by Saints, or other Creatures?

No, for a lawful Oath is an Invocation of God, whereby we desire that he, as the only searcher of Hearts, bear Witness unto the Truth, and will punish the Swearer if he wittingly swear falsely: but this Honour agreeth to no Creature.

Question 118, from Question 92

What is the law of God?fourth Commandment?

God spake all these words, Exod. xx. Deut. v. saying, hath I. Com. Remember that thou II. not unto thyself any that thyself serve visiting iniquity showing unto that keep III. holy the IV. Sabbath Day: to keep it holy: six Days shalt thou labor, and do all thy work; that thou hast to do, but the seventh Day is the Sabbath of the Lord thy God, in it thou shalt do no manner of Work, Thou, nor thy Son, nor thy Daughter, thy Man-Servant, nor thy Maid-Servant, nor thy Cattel, nor thy the Stranger that is within thy Gates: for in six Days the Lord made Heaven, and Earth, the Sea, and all that in them is, and rested the seventh day, wherefore the Lord blessed the sabbath day, and hallowed it.V. thy upon VI. not kill. VII. VIII. IX. X. thou shalt not covet thy neighbour’s man-servant, maid-servant, thy neighbour’s.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 92

What is the law of God?

God spake all these words, Exod. xx. Deut. v. saying, I am the Lord thy God, which hath brought thee out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage. I. Com. Thou shalt have no other gods before me. II. Thou shalt not make unto thyself any graven image, nor the likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or in the earth beneath, or in the water under the earth. Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them; for I, the Lord thy God, am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children, unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me, and showing mercy unto thousands of them that love me and keep my commandments. III. Thou shalt not take the name of the Lord thy God in vain: for the Lord will not hold him guiltless, that taketh his name in vain. IV. Remember the sabbath day, to keep it holy: six days shalt thou labour and do all thy work; but the seventh day is the sabbath of the Lord thy God: in it thou shalt do no manner of work, thou, nor thy son, nor thy daughter, thy man-servant, nor thy maid-servant, nor thy cattle, nor thy stranger that is within thy gates. For in six days the Lord made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them is, and rested the seventh day: wherefore the Lord blessed the sabbath day, and hallowed it. V. Honour thy father and thy mother, that thy days may be long upon the land, which the Lord thy God giveth thee. VI. Thou shalt not kill. VII. Thou shalt not commit adultery. VIII. Thou shalt not steal. IX. Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbour. X. Thou shalt not covet thy neighbour’s house; thou shalt not covet thy neighbour’s wife, nor his man-servant, nor his maid-servant, nor his ox, nor his ass, nor any thing that is thy neighbour’s.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 118

What is the fourth Commandment?

Remember that thou keep holy the Sabbath Day: six Days shalt thou labor, and do all that thou hast to do, but the seventh Day is the Sabbath of the Lord thy God, in it thou shalt do no manner of Work, Thou, nor thy Son, nor thy Daughter, thy Man-Servant, nor thy Maid-Servant, nor thy Cattel, nor the Stranger that is within thy Gates: for in six Days the Lord made Heaven, and Earth, the Sea, and all that in them is, and rested the seventh day, and hallowed it.

Question 119, from Question 103

What doth God require in are we taught by the fourth command?Commandment?

First: That the ministry of the Gospel, and the schools be maintained; and that I, especially on the sabbath, that is on the of rest, diligently frequent one Day in seven be kept in the church Worship of God, which under the old Testament was the last Day of to hear his word, to use the Week, but under the Gospel changed to the sacraments, publicly to call, upon first Day of the Week, and this Lord’s Day to be spent in private and publique Devotion, as hearing the Word diligently, practising the Lord, and contribute to the relief Gospel-Sacraments zealously, and doing Deeds of Charity conscionably, and resting from servil Works, cases of necessity excepted, this being the poor, as becomes a Christian: secondly, that all laudable Practice of the days of my life I cease from my evil works, and yield myself holy Apostles, who best knew the Mind of Christ as to the Lord, to work by his holy spirit in me: and thus begin in this life time of Worship; neither do we find in all the new Testament, that any Gospel Church in the Apostles times did set any other Day apart solemnly to worship God, save the first Day: and well might they so do, for if Israel, the natural Seed of Abraham, was to keep the seventh Day, to keep up the Remembrance of their Deliverance out of temporal Bondage, how much more are we bound to keep the first Day in Remembrance of Christ’s Deliverance of us from eternal sabbath.Bondage?

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 103

What doth God require in the fourth command?

First: that the ministry of the Gospel, and the schools be maintained; and that I, especially on the sabbath, that is on the day of rest, diligently frequent the church of God to hear his word, to use the sacraments, publicly to call, upon the Lord, and contribute to the relief of the poor, as becomes a Christian: secondly, that all the days of my life I cease from my evil works, and yield myself to the Lord, to work by his holy spirit in me: and thus begin in this life the eternal sabbath.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 119

What are we taught by the fourth Commandment?

That one Day in seven be kept in the Worship of God, which under the old Testament was the last Day of the Week, but under the Gospel changed to the first Day of the Week, and this Lord’s Day to be spent in private and publique Devotion, as hearing the Word diligently, practising the Gospel-Sacraments zealously, and doing Deeds of Charity conscionably, and resting from servil Works, cases of necessity excepted, this being the laudable Practice of the holy Apostles, who best knew the Mind of Christ as to the time of Worship; neither do we find in all the new Testament, that any Gospel Church in the Apostles times did set any other Day apart solemnly to worship God, save the first Day: and well might they so do, for if Israel, the natural Seed of Abraham, was to keep the seventh Day, to keep up the Remembrance of their Deliverance out of temporal Bondage, how much more are we bound to keep the first Day in Remembrance of Christ’s Deliverance of us from eternal Bondage?

Question 120, from Question 92

What is the law of God?fifth Commandment?

God spake all these words, Exod. xx. Deut. v. saying, hath I. Com. II. not unto thyself any that thyself serve visiting iniquity showing unto that III. IV. to keep it holy: thy work; thy wherefore the Lord blessed the sabbath day, V. Honour thy Father and thy Mother, that thy dayes may be long upon in the Land which the Lord thy God giveth thee.VI. not kill. VII. VIII. IX. X. thou shalt not covet thy neighbour’s man-servant, maid-servant, thy neighbour’s.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 92

What is the law of God?

God spake all these words, Exod. xx. Deut. v. saying, I am the Lord thy God, which hath brought thee out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage. I. Com. Thou shalt have no other gods before me. II. Thou shalt not make unto thyself any graven image, nor the likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or in the earth beneath, or in the water under the earth. Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them; for I, the Lord thy God, am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children, unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me, and showing mercy unto thousands of them that love me and keep my commandments. III. Thou shalt not take the name of the Lord thy God in vain: for the Lord will not hold him guiltless, that taketh his name in vain. IV. Remember the sabbath day, to keep it holy: six days shalt thou labour and do all thy work; but the seventh day is the sabbath of the Lord thy God: in it thou shalt do no manner of work, thou, nor thy son, nor thy daughter, thy man-servant, nor thy maid-servant, nor thy cattle, nor thy stranger that is within thy gates. For in six days the Lord made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them is, and rested the seventh day: wherefore the Lord blessed the sabbath day, and hallowed it. V. Honour thy father and thy mother, that thy days may be long upon the land, which the Lord thy God giveth thee. VI. Thou shalt not kill. VII. Thou shalt not commit adultery. VIII. Thou shalt not steal. IX. Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbour. X. Thou shalt not covet thy neighbour’s house; thou shalt not covet thy neighbour’s wife, nor his man-servant, nor his maid-servant, nor his ox, nor his ass, nor any thing that is thy neighbour’s.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 120

What is the fifth Commandment?

Honour thy Father and Mother, that thy dayes may be long in the Land which the Lord thy God giveth thee.

Question 121, from Question 104

What doth God require enjoin us in the fifth command?Commandment?

That I show all we yeild due honour, love, and fidelity, faithfulness to my father our Parents, and mother, and so to all in authority who bear Rule over me, us, and submit myself our selves with such obedience as is meet to their good instruction faithful Commandments and correction with due obedience; chastisements; and further also by that our patience we bear and suffer their manners, ever thinking with our selves that God will govern and patiently with their weaknesses infirmities, since it pleases to guide us by their hand.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 104

What doth God require in the fifth command?

That I show all honour, love, and fidelity, to my father and mother, and all in authority over me, and submit myself to their good instruction and correction with due obedience; and also patiently bear with their weaknesses and infirmities, since it pleases God to govern us by their hand.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 121

What doth God enjoin us in the fifth Commandment?

That we yeild due honour, love, and faithfulness to our Parents, and so to all who bear Rule over us, and submit our selves with such obedience as is meet to their faithful Commandments and chastisements; and further also by that our patience we bear and suffer their manners, ever thinking with our selves that God will govern and guide us by their hand.

Question 122, from Question 92

What is the law of God?sixth Commandment?

God spake all these words, Exod. xx. Deut. v. saying, hath I. Com. Thou shalt II. not unto thyself any that thyself serve visiting iniquity showing unto that III. IV. to keep it holy: do thy work; no thy wherefore the Lord blessed the sabbath day, V. thy upon VI. not kill. VII. VIII. IX. X. thou shalt not covet thy neighbour’s man-servant, maid-servant, thy neighbour’s.Murder.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 92

What is the law of God?

God spake all these words, Exod. xx. Deut. v. saying, I am the Lord thy God, which hath brought thee out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage. I. Com. Thou shalt have no other gods before me. II. Thou shalt not make unto thyself any graven image, nor the likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or in the earth beneath, or in the water under the earth. Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them; for I, the Lord thy God, am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children, unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me, and showing mercy unto thousands of them that love me and keep my commandments. III. Thou shalt not take the name of the Lord thy God in vain: for the Lord will not hold him guiltless, that taketh his name in vain. IV. Remember the sabbath day, to keep it holy: six days shalt thou labour and do all thy work; but the seventh day is the sabbath of the Lord thy God: in it thou shalt do no manner of work, thou, nor thy son, nor thy daughter, thy man-servant, nor thy maid-servant, nor thy cattle, nor thy stranger that is within thy gates. For in six days the Lord made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them is, and rested the seventh day: wherefore the Lord blessed the sabbath day, and hallowed it. V. Honour thy father and thy mother, that thy days may be long upon the land, which the Lord thy God giveth thee. VI. Thou shalt not kill. VII. Thou shalt not commit adultery. VIII. Thou shalt not steal. IX. Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbour. X. Thou shalt not covet thy neighbour’s house; thou shalt not covet thy neighbour’s wife, nor his man-servant, nor his maid-servant, nor his ox, nor his ass, nor any thing that is thy neighbour’s.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 122

What is the sixth Commandment?

Thou shalt do no Murder.

Question 123, from Question 105

What doth God require exact in the sixth command?Commandment?

That neither in thoughts, thought nor words, nor gestures, in gesture, much less in deeds, deed, I dishonour, reproach, or hate, wound or harm, or kill my Neighbour, either by myself my self, or by another, but that I lay aside cast away all desire of revenge; also, furthermore, that I hurt not myself, my self, nor wilfully expose myself to cast my self wittingly into any Danger. Wherefore also that Murther might not be committed, he hath armed the Magistrate is armed with the Sword.to prevent murder.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 105

What doth God require in the sixth command?

That neither in thoughts, nor words, nor gestures, much less in deeds, I dishonour, hate, wound or kill my neighbour, by myself or by another; but that I lay aside all desire of revenge: also, that I hurt not myself, nor wilfully expose myself to any danger: wherefore also the magistrate is armed with the sword, to prevent murder.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 123

What doth God exact in the sixth Commandment?

That neither in thought nor in gesture, much less in deed, I reproach, or hate, or harm, or kill my Neighbour, either by my self, or by another, but cast away all desire of revenge; furthermore, that I hurt not my self, nor cast my self wittingly into any Danger. Wherefore also that Murther might not be committed, he hath armed the Magistrate with the Sword.

Question 124, from Question 106

But this command Commandment seems to forbid Murther only?to speak of murder?

But in forbidding Murther, God teaches us doth further teach, that he abhors hateth the causes thereof; such as Root, to wit, Anger, Envy, Hatred, anger, and Desire of Revenge, and that he accounts doth account them all these as for Murther.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 106

But this command seems only to speak of murder?

In forbidding murder, God teaches us that he abhors the causes thereof; such as envy, hatred, anger, and desire of revenge; and that he accounts all these as murder.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 124

But this Commandment seems to forbid Murther only?

But in forbidding Murther, God doth further teach, that he hateth the Root, to wit, Anger, Envy, Hatred, and Desire of Revenge, and doth account them all for Murther.

Question 125, from Question 107

But Is it enough then that we don’t kill any no Man, in the manner mentioned above?such sort as hath been said?

No: It is not enough; for when God forbids condemneth Anger, Envy, Hatred, and anger, he commands us to requireth that we love our Neighbour as ourselves; to show patience, peace, meekness, mercy, and all kindness, towards him; and prevent his hurt as much as in us lies: our selves and that we use Humanity, Lenity, Courtesie, Patience, and Mercy towards him, and turn away from him as much as we may whatsoever may be hurtful unto him; in a word, that we be so affected in Mind as that we stick not to do good even to also unto our Enemies.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 107

But is it enough that we don’t kill any man in the manner mentioned above?

No: for when God forbids envy, hatred, and anger, he commands us to love our neighbour as ourselves; to show patience, peace, meekness, mercy, and all kindness, towards him; and prevent his hurt as much as in us lies: and that we do good, even to our enemies.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 125

Is it enough then that we kill no Man, in such sort as hath been said?

It is not enough; for when God condemneth Anger, Envy, Hatred, he requireth that we love our Neighbour as our selves and that we use Humanity, Lenity, Courtesie, Patience, and Mercy towards him, and turn away from him as much as we may whatsoever may be hurtful unto him; in a word, that we be so affected in Mind as that we stick not to do good also unto our Enemies.

Question 126, from Question 92

What is the law of God?seventh Commandment?

God spake all these words, Exod. xx. Deut. v. saying, hath I. Com. Thou shalt II. not unto thyself any that not thyself serve visiting iniquity showing unto that III. IV. to keep it holy: thy work; thy wherefore the Lord blessed the sabbath day, V. thy upon VI. not kill. VII. commit Adultery.VIII. IX. X. thou shalt not covet thy neighbour’s man-servant, maid-servant, thy neighbour’s.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 92

What is the law of God?

God spake all these words, Exod. xx. Deut. v. saying, I am the Lord thy God, which hath brought thee out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage. I. Com. Thou shalt have no other gods before me. II. Thou shalt not make unto thyself any graven image, nor the likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or in the earth beneath, or in the water under the earth. Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them; for I, the Lord thy God, am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children, unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me, and showing mercy unto thousands of them that love me and keep my commandments. III. Thou shalt not take the name of the Lord thy God in vain: for the Lord will not hold him guiltless, that taketh his name in vain. IV. Remember the sabbath day, to keep it holy: six days shalt thou labour and do all thy work; but the seventh day is the sabbath of the Lord thy God: in it thou shalt do no manner of work, thou, nor thy son, nor thy daughter, thy man-servant, nor thy maid-servant, nor thy cattle, nor thy stranger that is within thy gates. For in six days the Lord made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them is, and rested the seventh day: wherefore the Lord blessed the sabbath day, and hallowed it. V. Honour thy father and thy mother, that thy days may be long upon the land, which the Lord thy God giveth thee. VI. Thou shalt not kill. VII. Thou shalt not commit adultery. VIII. Thou shalt not steal. IX. Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbour. X. Thou shalt not covet thy neighbour’s house; thou shalt not covet thy neighbour’s wife, nor his man-servant, nor his maid-servant, nor his ox, nor his ass, nor any thing that is thy neighbour’s.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 126

What is the seventh Commandment?

Thou shalt not commit Adultery.

Question 127, from Question 108

What doth is the meaning of the seventh command teach us?Commandment?

That all uncleanness is accursed of God hath in Execration all Turpitude and that Filthiness, and therefore we also must with all our hearts detest the same, utterly hate, and detest it, and live chastely contrary-wife, live temperately, modestly, and chastly, whether we live in holy Wedlock, or in a single life.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 108

What doth the seventh command teach us?

That all uncleanness is accursed of God: and that therefore we must with all our hearts detest the same, and live chastely and temperately, whether in holy wedlock or in a single life.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 127

What is the meaning of the seventh Commandment?

That God hath in Execration all Turpitude and Filthiness, and therefore we also must utterly hate, and detest it, and contrary-wife, live temperately, modestly, and chastly, whether we live in holy Wedlock, or in single life.

Question 128, from Question 109

Doth Forbiddeth God forbid nothing else in this command, only Commandment but actual Adultery, and such like gross sins?kinds of uncleanness?

Since Yea, for seeing both our Body and Soul are the Temples of the Holy Ghost, he commands God will have us to preserve them pure possess both in Purity and holy: Holiness, and therefore he forbids all unchaste actions, Deeds, Gestures, Words, Thoughts, desires, filthy Lusts, and whatever can entice men thereto.whatsoever inticeth a Man unto these, all these God wholly forbiddeth.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 109

Doth God forbid in this command, only adultery, and such like gross sins?

Since both our body and soul are temples of the Holy Ghost, he commands us to preserve them pure and holy: therefore he forbids all unchaste actions, gestures, words, thoughts, desires, and whatever can entice men thereto.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 128

Forbiddeth God nothing else in this Commandment but actual Adultery, and such kinds of uncleanness?

Yea, for seeing both our Body and Soul are the Temples of the Holy Ghost, God will have us to possess both in Purity and Holiness, and therefore Deeds, Gestures, Words, Thoughts, filthy Lusts, and whatsoever inticeth a Man unto these, all these God wholly forbiddeth.

Question 129, from Question 92

What is the law of God?eighth Commandment?

God spake all these words, Exod. xx. Deut. v. saying, hath I. Com. Thou shalt II. not unto thyself any that not thyself serve visiting iniquity showing unto that III. IV. to keep it holy: thy work; thy wherefore the Lord blessed the sabbath day, V. thy upon VI. not kill. VII. VIII. steal.IX. X. thou shalt not covet thy neighbour’s man-servant, maid-servant, thy neighbour’s.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 92

What is the law of God?

God spake all these words, Exod. xx. Deut. v. saying, I am the Lord thy God, which hath brought thee out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage. I. Com. Thou shalt have no other gods before me. II. Thou shalt not make unto thyself any graven image, nor the likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or in the earth beneath, or in the water under the earth. Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them; for I, the Lord thy God, am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children, unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me, and showing mercy unto thousands of them that love me and keep my commandments. III. Thou shalt not take the name of the Lord thy God in vain: for the Lord will not hold him guiltless, that taketh his name in vain. IV. Remember the sabbath day, to keep it holy: six days shalt thou labour and do all thy work; but the seventh day is the sabbath of the Lord thy God: in it thou shalt do no manner of work, thou, nor thy son, nor thy daughter, thy man-servant, nor thy maid-servant, nor thy cattle, nor thy stranger that is within thy gates. For in six days the Lord made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them is, and rested the seventh day: wherefore the Lord blessed the sabbath day, and hallowed it. V. Honour thy father and thy mother, that thy days may be long upon the land, which the Lord thy God giveth thee. VI. Thou shalt not kill. VII. Thou shalt not commit adultery. VIII. Thou shalt not steal. IX. Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbour. X. Thou shalt not covet thy neighbour’s house; thou shalt not covet thy neighbour’s wife, nor his man-servant, nor his maid-servant, nor his ox, nor his ass, nor any thing that is thy neighbour’s.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 129

What is the eighth Commandment?

Thou shalt not steal.

Question 130, from Question 110

What doth God forbid in the eighth command?Commandment?

God forbids Not only those Thefts and Robberies, which are punishable by the Magistrate punisheth, but he comprehends under by the name of Theft all wicked tricks he comprehendeth whatsoever Evil, Crafts, Fetches, and Devices, whereby we design to appropriate to ourselves the seek after other Mens Goods, which belong to our neighbour: whether it be by and indeavour with force, or under the appearance with some shew of Right, as by unjust weights, ells, measures, fraudulent merchandise, coins, to convey them over unto our selves; of which sort are false Weights, false Ells uneven Measures, deceitful Marchandize, counterfeit Coin, Usury, or by any other way forbidden by as also or means of furthering our Estate, which God hath forbidden: to these we may add all Covetousness, all abuse and waste the manifold wast and abusing of his Gods Gifts.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 110

What doth God forbid in the eighth command?

God forbids not only those thefts, and robberies, which are punishable by the magistrate; but he comprehends under the name of theft all wicked tricks and devices, whereby we design to appropriate to ourselves the goods which belong to our neighbour: whether it be by force, or under the appearance of right; as by unjust weights, ells, measures, fraudulent merchandise, false coins, usury, or by any other way forbidden by God; as also all covetousness, all abuse and waste of his gifts.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 130

What doth God forbid in the eighth Commandment?

Not only those Thefts and Robberies, which the Magistrate punisheth, but by the name of Theft he comprehendeth whatsoever Evil, Crafts, Fetches, and Devices, whereby we seek after other Mens Goods, and indeavour with force, or with some shew of Right, to convey them over unto our selves; of which sort are false Weights, false Ells uneven Measures, deceitful Marchandize, counterfeit Coin, Usury, or any other way or means of furthering our Estate, which God hath forbidden: to these we may add all Covetousness, and the manifold wast and abusing of Gods Gifts.

Question 131, from Question 111

But What doth are those things which God require in this command?here commandeth?

That to my Power, I promote help and further the advantage Commodities and Profit of my Neighbour, in every instance I can or may; and that I so deal with him as I would desire to be dealt with by others: further also, my self, and that I do my own Work plainly and faithfully, labour, so that I may be able to relieve the needy.thereby help others who are distressed with any need or Calamity.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 111

But what doth God require in this command?

That I promote the advantage of my neighbour in every instance I can or may; and deal with him as I desire to be dealt with by others: further also, that I faithfully labour, so that I may be able to relieve the needy.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 131

What are those things which God here commandeth?

That to my Power, I help and further the Commodities and Profit of my Neighbour, and that I so deal with him as I would desire to be dealt with my self, and that I do my own Work plainly and faithfully, that I may thereby help others who are distressed with any need or Calamity.

Question 132, from Question 92

What is the law of God?ninth Commandment?

God spake all these words, Exod. xx. Deut. v. saying, hath I. Com. Thou shalt II. not unto thyself any that not thyself serve visiting iniquity showing unto that III. IV. to keep it holy: thy work; thy wherefore the Lord blessed the sabbath day, V. thy upon VI. not kill. VII. VIII. IX. bear false Witness against thy Neighbour.X. thou shalt not covet thy neighbour’s man-servant, maid-servant, thy neighbour’s.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 92

What is the law of God?

God spake all these words, Exod. xx. Deut. v. saying, I am the Lord thy God, which hath brought thee out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage. I. Com. Thou shalt have no other gods before me. II. Thou shalt not make unto thyself any graven image, nor the likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or in the earth beneath, or in the water under the earth. Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them; for I, the Lord thy God, am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children, unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me, and showing mercy unto thousands of them that love me and keep my commandments. III. Thou shalt not take the name of the Lord thy God in vain: for the Lord will not hold him guiltless, that taketh his name in vain. IV. Remember the sabbath day, to keep it holy: six days shalt thou labour and do all thy work; but the seventh day is the sabbath of the Lord thy God: in it thou shalt do no manner of work, thou, nor thy son, nor thy daughter, thy man-servant, nor thy maid-servant, nor thy cattle, nor thy stranger that is within thy gates. For in six days the Lord made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them is, and rested the seventh day: wherefore the Lord blessed the sabbath day, and hallowed it. V. Honour thy father and thy mother, that thy days may be long upon the land, which the Lord thy God giveth thee. VI. Thou shalt not kill. VII. Thou shalt not commit adultery. VIII. Thou shalt not steal. IX. Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbour. X. Thou shalt not covet thy neighbour’s house; thou shalt not covet thy neighbour’s wife, nor his man-servant, nor his maid-servant, nor his ox, nor his ass, nor any thing that is thy neighbour’s.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 132

What is the ninth Commandment?

Thou shalt not bear false Witness against thy Neighbour.

Question 133, from Question 112

What is required in doth the ninth command?Commandment exact?

That I bear no false Witness against no any Man, nor neither falsifie any Man’s words, that I be no backbiter, neither backbite nor slanderer; that I do not judge, or join in condemning reproach any Man, nor condemn any rashly, or unheard, but that I avoid, and shun with all carefulness all sorts kind of Lies, and Deceipts, as the proper Works of the Devil, unless except I would bring down upon mean to stir up against me the heavy most grievous Wrath of God; likewise and that in Judgments and all other dealings Affairs, I love follow the Truth, speak it uprightly and freely and constantly profess the matter as it indeed is, and confess also that I moreover defend and promote, increase as much as I am able, in me lieth, the honour and character good Name and Estimation of my neighbour.others.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 112

What is required in the ninth command?

That I bear false witness against no man; nor falsify any man’s words; that I be no backbiter, nor slanderer; that I do not judge, or join in condemning any man rashly, or unheard; but that I avoid all sorts of lies and deceit, as the proper works of the devil, unless I would bring down upon me the heavy wrath of God: likewise that in judgment and all other dealings I love the truth, speak it uprightly and confess it; also that I defend and promote, as much as I am able, the honour and good character of my neighbour.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 133

What doth the ninth Commandment exact?

That I bear no false Witness against any Man, neither falsifie any Man’s words, neither backbite nor reproach any Man, nor condemn any rashly, or unheard, but avoid, and shun with all carefulness all kind of Lies, and Deceipts, as the proper Works of the Devil, except I mean to stir up against me the most grievous Wrath of God; and that in Judgments and other Affairs, I follow the Truth, and freely and constantly profess the matter as it indeed is, and moreover defend and increase as much as in me lieth, the good Name and Estimation of others.

Question 134, from Question 92

What is the law of God?tenth Commandment?

God spake all these words, Exod. xx. Deut. v. saying, hath I. Com. Thou shalt II. not unto thyself any that not thyself serve visiting iniquity showing unto that III. IV. to keep it holy: thy work; thy wherefore the Lord blessed the sabbath day, V. thy upon VI. not kill. VII. VIII. IX. X. covet thy Neighbours House, thou shalt not covet thy neighbour’s nor his Wife, nor his man-servant, Servant, nor his maid-servant, Maid, nor his Ox, nor his Ass, nor any thing that is thy neighbour’s.his.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 92

What is the law of God?

God spake all these words, Exod. xx. Deut. v. saying, I am the Lord thy God, which hath brought thee out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage. I. Com. Thou shalt have no other gods before me. II. Thou shalt not make unto thyself any graven image, nor the likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or in the earth beneath, or in the water under the earth. Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them; for I, the Lord thy God, am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children, unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me, and showing mercy unto thousands of them that love me and keep my commandments. III. Thou shalt not take the name of the Lord thy God in vain: for the Lord will not hold him guiltless, that taketh his name in vain. IV. Remember the sabbath day, to keep it holy: six days shalt thou labour and do all thy work; but the seventh day is the sabbath of the Lord thy God: in it thou shalt do no manner of work, thou, nor thy son, nor thy daughter, thy man-servant, nor thy maid-servant, nor thy cattle, nor thy stranger that is within thy gates. For in six days the Lord made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them is, and rested the seventh day: wherefore the Lord blessed the sabbath day, and hallowed it. V. Honour thy father and thy mother, that thy days may be long upon the land, which the Lord thy God giveth thee. VI. Thou shalt not kill. VII. Thou shalt not commit adultery. VIII. Thou shalt not steal. IX. Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbour. X. Thou shalt not covet thy neighbour’s house; thou shalt not covet thy neighbour’s wife, nor his man-servant, nor his maid-servant, nor his ox, nor his ass, nor any thing that is thy neighbour’s.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 134

What is the tenth Commandment?

Thou shalt not covet thy Neighbours House, nor his Wife, nor his Servant, nor his Maid, nor his Ox, nor his Ass, nor any thing that is his.

Question 135, from Question 113

What doth the tenth Commandment require of us?forbid?

That even the smallest inclination or thought, contrary to any of God’s commands, never rise in our Hearts be not at any time moved by the least Desire or Cogitation against any Commandment of God, but that at all times continually and from our Heart we hate detest all Sin, with our whole hearts, and contrarily delight in all Righteousness.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 113

What doth the tenth commandment require of us?

That even the smallest inclination or thought, contrary to any of God’s commands, never rise in our hearts; but that at all times we hate all sin with our whole hearts, and delight in all righteousness.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 135

What doth the tenth Commandment forbid?

That our Hearts be not at any time moved by the least Desire or Cogitation against any Commandment of God, but that continually and from our Heart we detest all Sin, and contrarily delight in all Righteousness.

Question 136, from Question 114

But can those, they who are converted to God, perfectly observe, and keep these commands?Commandments?

No, but even the holiest Men while in this life, as long they live, have only small Beginnings of this Obedience, yet so that with a sincere resolution, they begin with an unfeigned and earnest desire and endeavour to live not only according to some only, but according to all the Commandments of God.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 114

But can those, who are converted to God, perfectly keep these commands?

No: But even the holiest men, while in this life, have only small beginnings of this obedience; yet so, that with a sincere resolution, they begin to live, not only according to some, but all the commands of God.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 136

But can they who are converted to God, perfectly observe, and keep these Commandments?

No, but even the holiest Men as long they live, have only small Beginnings of this Obedience, yet so that they begin with an unfeigned and earnest desire and endeavour to live not according to some only, but according to all the Commandments of God.

Question 137, from Question 115

Why will God then have the ten commands his Law to be so strictly exactly and severely preached since seeing there is no Man in this life can able to keep them?it?

First, That all our life time we may learn more and to know sinful & more acknowledg the great proneness of our Nature to Sin, and thus become so much the more earnest in seeking the greedily desire remission of Sins, and Righteousness in Christ. likewise, Secondly, That we constantly endeavour be doing of this always, and pray to God for always thinking of it, and so implore and crave of the Father the Grace of the his Holy Spirit, that whereby we may become daily more and more conformable be renewed to the Image and likeness of God, till we arrive the perfection proposed to us, in a to come.until at length after we are departed out of this life we may joyfully attain unto that Perfection which is promised unto us.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 115

Why will God then have the ten commands so strictly preached, since no man in this life can keep them?

First: that all our life time, we may learn more and more to know our sinful nature, and thus become the more earnest in seeking the remission of sin, and righteousness in Christ; likewise, that we constantly endeavour and pray to God for the grace of the holy spirit; that we may become more and more conformable to the image of God, till we arrive at the perfection proposed to us, in a life to come.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 137

Why will God then have his Law to be so exactly and severely preached seeing there is no Man in this life able to keep it?

First, That all our life time we more & more acknowledg the great proneness of our Nature to Sin, and so much the more greedily desire remission of Sins, and Righteousness in Christ. Secondly, That we be doing of this always, and always thinking of it, and so implore and crave of the Father the Grace of his Holy Spirit, whereby we may daily more and more be renewed to the Image and likeness of God, until at length after we are departed out of this life we may joyfully attain unto that Perfection which is promised unto us.

Question 138, from Question 116

Why Wherefore is Prayer necessary for Christians?

Because it is the chief part of that thankfulness which God requireth of us, and also because God will give giveth them only his Grace and Holy Spirit, to those only, who with sincere desires continually ask unfeigned gronings beg them continually of him and are thankful yeild him thanks for them.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 116

Why is prayer necessary for Christians?

Because it is the chief part of thankfulness which God requires of us: and also because God will give his grace and holy spirit to those only, who with sincere desires continually ask them of him, and are thankful for them.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 138

Wherefore is Prayer necessary for Christians?

Because it is the chief part of that thankfulness which God requireth of us, and also because God giveth them only his Grace and Holy Spirit, who with unfeigned gronings beg them continually of him and yeild him thanks for them.

Question 139, from Question 117

What are the requisites of is required unto that Prayer which is acceptable to shall please God, and which he will hear?be heard of him?

First, That we from ask of the heart pray to the one only true God, only, who hath manifested himself in his Word, for all things which he hath commanded us to ask be asked of him secondly, that we rightly with a true affection and thoroughly know desire of our Heart, and through an inward feeling of our need and misery that so we may deeply humble ourselves cast our selves down prostrate in the presence of his Divine Majesty, thirdly, and build our selves on this sure foundation, that we be fully persuaded that he, notwithstanding we are of it, will, the of Christ our Lord, hear our prayer, though unworthy, yet for Christ’s sake are certainly heard of God, even as he hath promised us in his Word.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 117

What are the requisites of that prayer, which is acceptable to God, and which he will hear?

First, that we from the heart pray to the one true God only, who hath manifested himself in his word, for all things, he hath commanded us to ask of him: secondly, that we rightly and thoroughly know our need and misery, that so we may deeply humble ourselves in the presence of his divine majesty: thirdly, that we be fully persuaded that he, notwithstanding we are unworthy of it, will, for the sake of Christ our Lord, certainly hear our prayer, as he has promised us in his word.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 139

What is required unto that Prayer which shall please God, and be heard of him?

That we ask of the only true God, who hath manifested himself in his Word, all things which he hath commanded to be asked of him with a true affection and desire of our Heart, and through an inward feeling of our need and misery cast our selves down prostrate in the presence of his Divine Majesty, and build our selves on this sure foundation, that we though unworthy, yet for Christ’s sake are certainly heard of God, even as he hath promised us in his Word.

Question 140, from Question 118

What hath God commanded are those things which he commandeth us to ask of him?

All things necessary both for Soul and Body, which Christ our Lord Jesus Christ hath comprised in that Prayer, he which himself hath taught us.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 118

What hath God commanded us to ask of him?

All things necessary for soul and body; which Christ our Lord has comprised in that prayer, he himself has taught us.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 140

What are those things which he commandeth us to ask of him?

All things necessary both for Soul and Body, which our Lord Jesus Christ hath comprised in that Prayer, which himself hath taught us.

Question 141, from Question 119

What are the words of Prayer is that?prayer?

Our Father which art in Heaven, hallowed be thy Name. Thy Kingdom come. Thy Will be done on Earth, as it is in Heaven. Give us this Day our daily Bread: And forgive us our debts Trespasses, as we forgive our debtors, them that trespass against us. And lead us not into Temptation, but deliver us from Evil: for thine is the Kingdom, the Power, and the Glory, for ever and ever, Amen.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 119

What are the words of that prayer?

Our Father which art in heaven, hallowed be thy name. Thy kingdom come. Thy will be done on earth, as it is in heaven. Give us this day our daily bread, and forgive us our debts as we forgive our debtors, and lead us not into temptation, but deliver us from evil. For thine is the kingdom, the power, and the glory, for ever. Amen.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 141

What Prayer is that?

Our Father which art in Heaven, hallowed be thy Name. Thy Kingdom come. Thy Will be done on Earth, as it is in Heaven. Give us this Day our daily Bread: And forgive us our Trespasses, as we forgive them that trespass against us. And lead us not into Temptation, but deliver us from Evil: for thine is the Kingdom, the Power, and the Glory, for ever and ever, Amen.

Question 142, only in An Orthodox Catechism (1680)

Are Christians tied to this very Form of Prayer?

We are not; our Lord here delivereth to his Church a brief Sum of those things which we are to ask of God, but yet Christ will have us also to descend unto specials, and to ask particular Benefits: for this Form prescribed is nothing else but a Set or Course of certain Heads or Generals, whereunto all Benefits both corporal and spiritual may be referred; but yet all particulars of Prayer must agree & correspond with this general Form, although we are not tied to this Form, as appeareth from James 1:5 where the Apostle exhorts the Saints, if any did lack Wisdom, they should ask of God, which giveth to all liberally, but these as touching the Words, are not in the Form of Prayer particularly expressed, though they are included. Besides, we have Examples of Prayer both in the old and new Testament, which are not the very Form here expressed, albeit, all they asked was comprehended in this Prayer, wherefore the Form of Prayer delivered unto us by Christ, is wholly a thing indifferent.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563) has no question like it.

Are Christians tied to this very Form of Prayer?

We are not; our Lord here delivereth to his Church a brief Sum of those things which we are to ask of God, but yet Christ will have us also to descend unto specials, and to ask particular Benefits: for this Form prescribed is nothing else but a Set or Course of certain Heads or Generals, whereunto all Benefits both corporal and spiritual may be referred; but yet all particulars of Prayer must agree & correspond with this general Form, although we are not tied to this Form, as appeareth from James 1:5 where the Apostle exhorts the Saints, if any did lack Wisdom, they should ask of God, which giveth to all liberally, but these as touching the Words, are not in the Form of Prayer particularly expressed, though they are included. Besides, we have Examples of Prayer both in the old and new Testament, which are not the very Form here expressed, albeit, all they asked was comprehended in this Prayer, wherefore the Form of Prayer delivered unto us by Christ, is wholly a thing indifferent.

Are Christians tied to this very Form of Prayer?

We are not; our Lord here delivers to his Church a brief Sum of those things which we are to ask of God, but yet Christ will have us also to descend unto specials, and to ask particular Benefits: for this Form prescribed is nothing else but a Set or Course of certain Heads or Generals, whereunto all Benefits both corporal and spiritual may be referred; but yet all particulars of Prayer must agree & correspond with this general Form, although we are not tied to this Form, as appears from James 1:5 where the Apostle exhorts the Saints, if any did lack Wisdom, they should ask of God, which gives to all liberally, but these as touching the Words, are not in the Form of Prayer particularly expressed, though they are included. Besides, we have Examples of Prayer both in the old and new Testament, which are not the very Form here expressed, albeit, all they asked was comprehended in this Prayer, wherefore the Form of Prayer delivered unto us by Christ, is wholly a thing indifferent.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563) has no question like it.

Are Christians tied to this very Form of Prayer?

We are not; our Lord here delivers to his Church a brief Sum of those things which we are to ask of God, but yet Christ will have us also to descend unto specials, and to ask particular Benefits: for this Form prescribed is nothing else but a Set or Course of certain Heads or Generals, whereunto all Benefits both corporal and spiritual may be referred; but yet all particulars of Prayer must agree & correspond with this general Form, although we are not tied to this Form, as appears from James 1:5 where the Apostle exhorts the Saints, if any did lack Wisdom, they should ask of God, which gives to all liberally, but these as touching the Words, are not in the Form of Prayer particularly expressed, though they are included. Besides, we have Examples of Prayer both in the old and new Testament, which are not the very Form here expressed, albeit, all they asked was comprehended in this Prayer, wherefore the Form of Prayer delivered unto us by Christ, is wholly a thing indifferent.

Question 143, from Question 120

Why hath doth Christ commanded teach us to address call God thus: our Father?

That immediately, presently in the very Entrance and Beginning of our the Prayer, he might excite stir up in us such a child-like Reverence, for, and Confidence in of God as is meet for the Sons of God, which are must be the ground and foundation of our Prayer, namely, to wit, that God has become through Christ is made our Father, in Christ, and will much less deny us what these things which we ask of him in with a true Faith, than our earthly Parents will refuse deny unto us earthly things.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 120

Why hath Christ commanded us to address God thus: “Our Father?”

That immediately, in the very beginning of our prayer, he might excite in us a child-like reverence for, and confidence in God, which are the foundation of our prayer: namely, that God has become our Father in Christ, and will much less deny us what we ask of him in true faith, than our parents will refuse us earthly things.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 143

Why doth Christ teach us to call God our Father?

That presently in the very Entrance and Beginning of the Prayer, he might stir up in us such a Reverence, and Confidence of God as is meet for the Sons of God, which must be the ground and foundation of our Prayer, to wit, that God through Christ is made our Father, and will much less deny us these things which we ask of him with a true Faith, than our earthly Parents deny unto us earthly things.

Question 144, from Question 121

Why is it here that added, which art in Heaven?

Lest That we should form any earthly conceptions conceive not basely nor terrenely of God’s Heavenly Majesty, and also that we may look for, and expect from his almighty power all Omnipotency whatsoever things are necessary for our Soul and Body.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 121

Why is it here added, “Which art in heaven?”

Lest we should form any earthly conceptions of God’s heavenly majesty, and that we may expect from his almighty power all things necessary for soul and body.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 144

Why is that added, which art in Heaven?

That we conceive not basely nor terrenely of God’s Heavenly Majesty, and also that we look for, and expect from his Omnipotency whatsoever things are necessary for our Soul and Body.

Question 145, from Question 122

Which What is the first Petition?

Hallowed be thy Name; that is, grant us, first rightly to know thee right, and to sanctify, glorify and thee, in all worship, praise, and magnifie thy works, in which thy power, wisdom, Almightiness, Goodness, Justice, Mercy and Truth, are clearly displayed; shining in all thy Works; and further also that we may so order and to direct our whole lives, our Life, Thoughts, Words, and actions, Works to this end, that thy most Holy Name may never be blasphemed, not reproach’d by us, but rather honoured be renowned with Honour, and praised on our account.Praises.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 122

Which is the first petition?

“Hallowed be thy name;” that is, grant us first rightly to know thee, and to sanctify, glorify and praise thee, in all thy works, in which thy power, wisdom, goodness, justice, mercy and truth, are clearly displayed; and further, also, that we may so order and direct our whole lives, our thoughts, words and actions, that thy name may never be blasphemed, but rather honoured and praised on our account.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 145

What is the first Petition?

Hallowed be thy Name; that is, grant us, first to know thee right, and worship, praise, and magnifie thy Almightiness, Goodness, Justice, Mercy and Truth, shining in all thy Works; and further also to direct our whole Life, Thoughts, Words, and Works to this end, that thy most Holy Name be not reproach’d by us, but rather be renowned with Honour, and Praises.

Question 146, from Question 123

Which What is the second Petition?

Thy Kingdom come; that is, rule for us so by thy Word and Spirit, that we may humble and Submit ourselves our selves more and more to unto thee. Also preserve and increase thy Church, destroy the Works of the Devil, and all violence which would exalt Power that lifteth up it self against thee; and also, wicked counsels devised thy Majesty; make all those Councils frustrate, and void, which are taken against thy holy Word, till the full perfection of thy kingdom takes place, wherein until at length thou raign fully and perfectly, when thou shalt be all in all.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 123

Which is the second petition?

“Thy Kingdom come;” that is, rule us so by thy word and spirit, that we may submit ourselves more and more to thee; preserve and increase thy church; destroy the works of the devil, and all violence which would exalt itself against thee; and also, all wicked counsels devised against thy holy word; till the full perfection of thy kingdom takes place, wherein thou shalt be all in all.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 146

What is the second Petition?

Thy Kingdom come; that is, rule for us so by thy Word and Spirit, that we may humble and Submit our selves more and more unto thee. Also preserve and increase thy Church, destroy the Works of the Devil, and all Power that lifteth up it self against thy Majesty; make all those Councils frustrate, and void, which are taken against thy Word, until at length thou raign fully and perfectly, when thou shalt be all in all.

Question 147, from Question 124

Which What is the third Petition?

Thy Will be done on in Earth, as it is in Heaven. That is, grant that we, and all Men, may renounce renouncing and forsaking our own Will, may readily, and without murmuring any grudging, obey thy Will, which is only good; holy; and that so every one may attend to and perform the duties his station and calling as willingly and of us may faithfully perform that Duty and Charge which thou hast committed unto us, even as the blessed Angels do in Heaven.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 124

Which is the third petition?

“Thy will be done on earth as it is in heaven;” that is, grant that we and all men may renounce our own will, and without murmuring obey thy will, which is only good; that so every one may attend to and perform the duties of his station and calling as willingly and faithfully, as the angels do in heaven.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 147

What is the third Petition?

Thy Will be done in Earth, as it is in Heaven. That is, grant that we, and all Men, renouncing and forsaking our own Will, may readily, and without any grudging, obey thy Will, which is only holy; and that so every one of us may faithfully perform that Duty and Charge which thou hast committed unto us, even as the blessed Angels do in Heaven.

Question 148, from Question 125

Which What is the fourth Petition?

Give us this Day our daily bread; that is, be pleased to provide give unto us with all all things necessary which are needful for the body, this Life, that by them we may thereby acknowledg and confess thee to be the only Fountain of from whence all good things flow; and that neither all our Care nor and Industry, nor and even thine own Gifts can profit us without thy blessing; therefore to be unfortunate and noisom unto us except thou bless them; wherefore grant that we may withdraw turning our Trust away from all Creatures, and we place and repose it alone in thee alone.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 125

Which is the fourth petition?

“Give us this day our daily bread;” that is, be pleased to provide us with all things necessary for the body, that we may thereby acknowledge thee to be the only fountain of all good, and that neither our care nor industry, nor even thy gifts can profit us without thy blessing; and therefore that we may withdraw our trust from all creatures, and place it alone in thee.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 148

What is the fourth Petition?

Give us this Day our daily bread; that is, give unto us all things which are needful for this Life, that by them we may acknowledg and confess thee to be the only Fountain from whence all good things flow; and all our Care and Industry, and even thine own Gifts to be unfortunate and noisom unto us except thou bless them; wherefore grant that turning our Trust away from all Creatures, we place and repose it in thee alone.

Question 149, from Question 126

Which What is the fifth Petition?

“And Forgive us our debts Trespasses, as we forgive our debtors;” them that trespass against us. That is, be pleased even for the sake of Christ’s Blood of Christ do not to impute to unto us poor most miserable and wretched sinners all our transgressions, nor Offences, neither that depravity, Corruption which always to still cleaveth unto us, even as we also feel this evidence Testimony of thy Grace in us, that it is firm resolution, the heart, to forgive neighbour.our Hearts, that we stedfastly purpose unfeignedly from our Hearts, to pardon and forgive all those who have offended us.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 126

Which is the fifth petition?

“And forgive us our debts as we forgive our debtors;” that is, be pleased for the sake of Christ’s blood, not to impute to us poor sinners, our transgressions, nor that depravity, which always cleaves to us; even as we feel this evidence of thy grace in us, that it is our firm resolution, from the heart, to forgive our neighbour.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 149

What is the fifth Petition?

Forgive us our Trespasses, as we forgive them that trespass against us. That is, even for the Blood of Christ do not impute unto us most miserable and wretched sinners all our Offences, neither that Corruption which still cleaveth unto us, even as we also feel this Testimony of thy Grace in our Hearts, that we stedfastly purpose unfeignedly from our Hearts, to pardon and forgive all those who have offended us.

Question 150, from Question 127

Which What is the sixth Petition?

“And Lead us not into Temptation, but deliver us from Evil. That is, since because we our selves, are so feeble and weak in ourselves, by Nature, that we cannot stand a so much as one Moment or Instant, and besides this, since our mortal most deadly Enemies the devil, Satan, the World, and our own Flesh cease not to do incessantly oppugne and assault us, do uphold thou therefore preserve us, and establish and strengthen us by the power might of thy holy Spirit, that we may not be overcome in this spiritual warfare; Combat yield as vanquished, but constantly and strenuously resist our foes, till last obtain a complete may so long stoutly withstand them, until at length we get the full and perfect victory.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 127

Which is the sixth petition?

“And lead us not into temptation, but deliver us from evil;” that is, since we are so weak in ourselves, that we cannot stand a moment; and besides this, since our mortal enemies, the devil, the world, and our own flesh cease not to assault us; do thou therefore preserve and strengthen us by the power of thy holy spirit, that we may not be overcome in this spiritual warfare; but constantly and strenuously may resist our foes, till at last we obtain a complete victory.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 150

What is the sixth Petition?

Lead us not into Temptation, but deliver us from Evil. That is, because we our selves, are so feeble and weak by Nature, that we cannot stand so much as one Moment or Instant, and our most deadly Enemies Satan, the World, and our own Flesh do incessantly oppugne and assault us, uphold thou us, and establish and strengthen us by the might of thy Spirit, that we may not in this spiritual Combat yield as vanquished, but may so long stoutly withstand them, until at length we get the full and perfect victory.

Question 151, from Question 128

How dost concludest thou conclude thy this Prayer?

For thine is the Kingdom, the Power, and the Glory for ever. That is, all these we ask and crave all these things of thee, because seeing both thou being art our King, and almighty, art Almighty, thou art both willing and able to give us good; them all unto us; and all this these things we pray for, therefore ask, that thereby out of them, not we, unto us, but unto thy holy Name all Glory may be glorified for ever.redound.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 128

How dost thou conclude thy prayer?

“For thine is the kingdom, the power and the glory for ever;” that is, all these we ask of thee, because thou, being our King and almighty, art willing and able to give us all good; and all this we pray for, that thereby not we, but thy holy name may be glorified for ever.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 151

How concludest thou this Prayer?

For thine is the Kingdom, the Power, and the Glory for ever. That is, we ask and crave all these things of thee, because seeing both thou art our King, and art Almighty, thou art both willing and able to give them all unto us; and these things we therefore ask, that out of them, not unto us, but unto thy holy Name all Glory may redound.

Question 152, from Question 129

What doth the word meaneth this Particle, Amen?signify?

“Amen” signifies, it shall truly That the thing is sure, and certainly be: out of doubt: for my Prayer is much more assuredly certainly heard of God, than I feel in my Heart that I unfeignedly desire these things of him.the same.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563), Question 129

What doth the word “Amen” signify?

“Amen” signifies, it shall truly and certainly be: for my prayer is more assuredly heard of God, than I feel in my heart that I desire these things of him.

An Orthodox Catechism (1680), Question 152

What meaneth this Particle, Amen?

That the thing is sure, and out of doubt: for my Prayer is much more certainly heard of God, than I feel in my Heart that I unfeignedly desire the same.